Group Antagonism as a Social Problem in Award-Winning Children’s Books: Stereotype, Prejudice, Discrimination

Esra Uslu, Canan Aslan
{"title":"Group Antagonism as a Social Problem in Award-Winning Children’s Books: Stereotype, Prejudice, Discrimination","authors":"Esra Uslu, Canan Aslan","doi":"10.31458/iejes.1218194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the perspective of language and literature education, children’s and youth books should be sensitive to the culture of human rights and democracy and should not endorse group antagonism such as stereotype, prejudice and discrimination. The main purpose of this research is to determine if there are any messages about group antagonisms in the award-winning children’s and youth stories/novels; and to understand the emotional aspect, style, context and content characteristics of those messages. The data source of this general survey model research consists of a total of 34 books that have received awards from various institutions and organizations in the field of children’s and youth literature. In the content analysis, the main category of group antagonism was divided into three subcategories: stereotype, prejudice and discrimination, which were further divided into sub-categories based on emotional aspect, style, context, and content and analyzed in cross-tables. The findings showed that most messages were in the prejudice category. In addition, it was determined that the messages that foster group antagonism were mostly related to the affective dimension and were conveyed in a blatant style and often without malicious intent. Within the scope of this study, it is recommended that fictional books addressing children and young people should address group antagonism with a critical and problem-oriented approach.","PeriodicalId":187210,"journal":{"name":"International e-Journal of Educational Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International e-Journal of Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1218194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the perspective of language and literature education, children’s and youth books should be sensitive to the culture of human rights and democracy and should not endorse group antagonism such as stereotype, prejudice and discrimination. The main purpose of this research is to determine if there are any messages about group antagonisms in the award-winning children’s and youth stories/novels; and to understand the emotional aspect, style, context and content characteristics of those messages. The data source of this general survey model research consists of a total of 34 books that have received awards from various institutions and organizations in the field of children’s and youth literature. In the content analysis, the main category of group antagonism was divided into three subcategories: stereotype, prejudice and discrimination, which were further divided into sub-categories based on emotional aspect, style, context, and content and analyzed in cross-tables. The findings showed that most messages were in the prejudice category. In addition, it was determined that the messages that foster group antagonism were mostly related to the affective dimension and were conveyed in a blatant style and often without malicious intent. Within the scope of this study, it is recommended that fictional books addressing children and young people should address group antagonism with a critical and problem-oriented approach.
获奖童书中的群体对抗:刻板印象、偏见、歧视
从语言和文学教育的角度来看,儿童和青少年书籍应该对人权和民主文化敏感,不应该支持刻板印象、偏见和歧视等群体对抗。本研究的主要目的是确定获奖的儿童和青少年故事/小说中是否存在关于群体对抗的信息;并理解这些信息的情感方面、风格、语境和内容特征。本次综合调查模型研究的数据来源包括在儿童和青少年文学领域的各个机构和组织中获得奖项的34本图书。在内容分析中,将群体对抗的主要类别分为刻板印象、偏见和歧视三个子类别,并根据情绪方面、风格、语境和内容进一步划分子类别,进行交叉表分析。调查结果显示,大多数信息都属于偏见类别。此外,我们还确定,培养群体对抗的信息大多与情感维度有关,并且以一种公然的方式传达,往往没有恶意。在本研究的范围内,建议针对儿童和青少年的小说应该用批判和问题导向的方法来解决群体对抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信