{"title":"Comparing notions of full derandomization","authors":"L. Fortnow","doi":"10.1109/CCC.2001.933869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the hypotheses of full derandomization fall into two sets of equivalent statements: those equivalent to the existence of efficient pseudorandom generators and those equivalent to approximating the accepting probability of a circuit. We give the first relativized world where these sets of equivalent statements are not equivalent to each other.","PeriodicalId":240268,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2001.933869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Abstract
Most of the hypotheses of full derandomization fall into two sets of equivalent statements: those equivalent to the existence of efficient pseudorandom generators and those equivalent to approximating the accepting probability of a circuit. We give the first relativized world where these sets of equivalent statements are not equivalent to each other.