Water Slug Simulation for Transient Multiphase Process Flow

Karlygash Kudaibergenova
{"title":"Water Slug Simulation for Transient Multiphase Process Flow","authors":"Karlygash Kudaibergenova","doi":"10.2118/212056-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Current paper represents water slug simulation details applied to realistic transient scenario of pigging gathering line that transfers oil and gas production to Tengiz Second Generation Plant.\n Pigging as well as any dynamic multiphase flow creates a big challenge for receiving facility causing not only inlet separators level fluctuations, but also carrying a risk of process upset and plant facilities damage downstream due to water flooding. Big diameter long distance transportation lines significantly contribute to this risk. One of the triggers to start using OLGA dynamic simulation tool in TCO on constant basis, was water flooding event that damaged stabilizer internals. Modeling is able to predict water slug, considering conditions for water settling in the pipeline prior to transient event, and thus allows to prevent or minimize potential upset.\n Several scenario results were reviewed and compared: one versus the other, including scenario with mitigation measures. Hilly underground profile and low flowrate through the line over certain amount of time appeared to be key factors in obtaining reasonable accumulated water content, whereas transient event speed defines how quickly this water will arrive as a slug. Recognizing processing facility handling limits, the control over impact could be maintained by increasing flowrate prior to event and/or reducing speed of change (pig velocity in this particular case). Besides getting realistic water slugs due to rigorous pipeline geometry and flow preconditions, slower actual historical pig movement (against earlier simulated with flat geometry) was finally explained.\n Present research was done to demonstrate how accurate and detailed inputs and preconditions to the simulation case can improve software predicted water slugs and create safe guidelines to overcome negative consequences. This practically discovered simulation strategy established itself as credible over few years, is allowing to manage all dynamic operations safely.","PeriodicalId":394241,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, November 15, 2022","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, November 15, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212056-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current paper represents water slug simulation details applied to realistic transient scenario of pigging gathering line that transfers oil and gas production to Tengiz Second Generation Plant. Pigging as well as any dynamic multiphase flow creates a big challenge for receiving facility causing not only inlet separators level fluctuations, but also carrying a risk of process upset and plant facilities damage downstream due to water flooding. Big diameter long distance transportation lines significantly contribute to this risk. One of the triggers to start using OLGA dynamic simulation tool in TCO on constant basis, was water flooding event that damaged stabilizer internals. Modeling is able to predict water slug, considering conditions for water settling in the pipeline prior to transient event, and thus allows to prevent or minimize potential upset. Several scenario results were reviewed and compared: one versus the other, including scenario with mitigation measures. Hilly underground profile and low flowrate through the line over certain amount of time appeared to be key factors in obtaining reasonable accumulated water content, whereas transient event speed defines how quickly this water will arrive as a slug. Recognizing processing facility handling limits, the control over impact could be maintained by increasing flowrate prior to event and/or reducing speed of change (pig velocity in this particular case). Besides getting realistic water slugs due to rigorous pipeline geometry and flow preconditions, slower actual historical pig movement (against earlier simulated with flat geometry) was finally explained. Present research was done to demonstrate how accurate and detailed inputs and preconditions to the simulation case can improve software predicted water slugs and create safe guidelines to overcome negative consequences. This practically discovered simulation strategy established itself as credible over few years, is allowing to manage all dynamic operations safely.
瞬态多相工艺流程的水段塞模拟
本文介绍了水段塞模拟的具体细节,并将其应用于腾吉兹二代厂输气清管集输管线的实际瞬态场景。清管和任何动态多相流都给接收设备带来了很大的挑战,不仅会导致进口分离器液位波动,而且还会带来由于水淹而导致下游工艺中断和工厂设施损坏的风险。大直径长距离运输线路显著增加了这种风险。在TCO中开始使用OLGA动态模拟工具的一个触发因素是水驱事件损坏了稳定器内部。建模能够预测水段塞,在瞬态事件发生之前考虑到水在管道中的沉降情况,从而可以防止或最小化潜在的扰动。审查并比较了几种情景结果:一种与另一种,包括具有缓解措施的情景。在一定时间内,坑洼的地下剖面和通过管线的低流量似乎是获得合理累积含水量的关键因素,而瞬态事件速度决定了水以段塞流的形式到达的速度。认识到处理设施的处理限制,可以通过在事件发生之前增加流量和/或降低变化速度(在这种特殊情况下为清管器速度)来保持对影响的控制。除了由于严格的管道几何形状和流动前提条件而获得真实的水段塞外,最终解释了实际历史清管器运动较慢的原因(与之前模拟的平面几何形状相比)。目前的研究是为了证明模拟案例的准确和详细的输入和前提条件如何能够提高软件对水段塞的预测,并制定安全的指导原则来克服负面后果。这种实际发现的模拟策略在几年的时间里建立了自己的可信度,可以安全地管理所有动态操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信