A comparison of production and economic performances of broilers raised under naturally ventilated open-house and tunnel ventilated closed-house systems in Sri Lanka.

N. Atapattu, L. Abeywickrama, W. Gunawardane, M. Munasinghe
{"title":"A comparison of production and economic performances of broilers raised under naturally ventilated open-house and tunnel ventilated closed-house systems in Sri Lanka.","authors":"N. Atapattu, L. Abeywickrama, W. Gunawardane, M. Munasinghe","doi":"10.4038/tare.v20i3-4.5393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare production and economic performances of broilers raised under naturally ven-tilated open house (OH) and tunnel ventilated-closed house (CH) conditions in Sri Lanka. The analysis used production and economic parameters of 130 OH (130 farms) and 88 CH (5 farms) production cycles. Open house farms were select-ed using proportionate random sampling technique while closed houses were purposively selected. The sum of the Per-centages of mortalities and disable birds was significantly higher under OH system compared to that under CH system. The most vulnerable periods for the losses due to mortalities were the first week and from day 29-35 of the growing cycle. The mean length of the growing cycle under OH (38.4 days) was significantly higher than that of CH (34.6 days). OH operators reported a significantly lower number of growing cycles/year (4.4) with a longer clean-out period (44 days) compared to CH (6.9 cycles/year and 18 days, respectively). Production performance indicators such as mortality (3.3%), final live weight (1974 g), feed conversion ratio (1.56), performance efficiency factor (356) of broilers under CH were significantly better than those under OH system (4.5%, 1922 g, 1.94 and 254, respectively). Cost of feeds and day-old-chicks accounted for 74.7 and 23, and 66.6 and 24% of the total variable costs of OH and CH, respectively. Raising of broilers under CH conditions recorded significantly lower total cost (Rs 440), higher net profit (Rs 85.6 bird-1 and unit profitability (Rs 46.8 m-2 day-1) than under OH (Rs 453 and Rs 58.9, Rs 13.2 m-2 day-1, respectively). Production and economic performance indicators and resource utilization efficiencies (temporal and spatial) of broiler production were concluded to be significantly better under CH than OH system. Though production performance parameters of the broiler production, particularly under CH systems were comparable with those of countries having well-developed poultry industries; feed and day-old-chick costs were higher in Sri Lanka.","PeriodicalId":191739,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tare.v20i3-4.5393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare production and economic performances of broilers raised under naturally ven-tilated open house (OH) and tunnel ventilated-closed house (CH) conditions in Sri Lanka. The analysis used production and economic parameters of 130 OH (130 farms) and 88 CH (5 farms) production cycles. Open house farms were select-ed using proportionate random sampling technique while closed houses were purposively selected. The sum of the Per-centages of mortalities and disable birds was significantly higher under OH system compared to that under CH system. The most vulnerable periods for the losses due to mortalities were the first week and from day 29-35 of the growing cycle. The mean length of the growing cycle under OH (38.4 days) was significantly higher than that of CH (34.6 days). OH operators reported a significantly lower number of growing cycles/year (4.4) with a longer clean-out period (44 days) compared to CH (6.9 cycles/year and 18 days, respectively). Production performance indicators such as mortality (3.3%), final live weight (1974 g), feed conversion ratio (1.56), performance efficiency factor (356) of broilers under CH were significantly better than those under OH system (4.5%, 1922 g, 1.94 and 254, respectively). Cost of feeds and day-old-chicks accounted for 74.7 and 23, and 66.6 and 24% of the total variable costs of OH and CH, respectively. Raising of broilers under CH conditions recorded significantly lower total cost (Rs 440), higher net profit (Rs 85.6 bird-1 and unit profitability (Rs 46.8 m-2 day-1) than under OH (Rs 453 and Rs 58.9, Rs 13.2 m-2 day-1, respectively). Production and economic performance indicators and resource utilization efficiencies (temporal and spatial) of broiler production were concluded to be significantly better under CH than OH system. Though production performance parameters of the broiler production, particularly under CH systems were comparable with those of countries having well-developed poultry industries; feed and day-old-chick costs were higher in Sri Lanka.
斯里兰卡自然通风开放式鸡舍和隧道通风封闭式鸡舍系统饲养肉鸡的生产和经济性能比较。
本研究的目的是比较斯里兰卡在自然通风开放式鸡舍(OH)和隧道通风封闭式鸡舍(CH)条件下饲养的肉鸡的生产性能和经济性能。利用130个OH(130个农场)和88个CH(5个农场)生产周期的生产和经济参数进行分析。采用比例随机抽样技术选择开放式养殖场,有目的选择封闭式养殖场。OH系统下病死率和致残率之和显著高于CH系统。死亡造成损失的最脆弱时期是生长周期的第一周和第29-35天。OH处理下的平均生长周期(38.4 d)显著高于CH处理(34.6 d)。与CH(分别为6.9次/年和18天)相比,OH作业公司的生长周期(4.4次/年)显著减少,清洗周期(44天)更长。CH组肉鸡的死亡率(3.3%)、末活重(1974 g)、饲料系数(1.56)、生产效率因子(356)均显著优于OH组(分别为4.5%、1922 g、1.94和254)。饲料成本和日龄雏鸡成本分别占OH和CH总可变成本的74.7%和23%,66.6%和24%。在高温条件下饲养肉鸡的总成本(440卢比)显著低于高温条件(分别为453卢比、58.9卢比和13.2卢比),净利润(85.6卢比)和单位盈利能力(46.8卢比)显著高于高温条件(分别为453卢比和58.9卢比)。结果表明,氢氧体系下肉鸡生产经济性能指标和资源利用效率(时间和空间)显著优于氢氧体系。尽管肉鸡生产的生产性能参数,特别是在CH系统下,与家禽业发达国家的生产性能参数相当;斯里兰卡的饲料和日龄雏鸡成本较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信