{"title":"The Meaning of Dark, Light and Shadows: Inferences in Art, Materiality and Cultural Practices","authors":"Frank Prendergast","doi":"10.46472/cc.0126.0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our visual awareness relies on light acting on the eye to perceive materiality and colour. Medieval thought wrestled to articulate and comprehend its nature. The notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci, for example, included his descriptions to define light and make comparisons so as to differentiate between light and shadow. His focus was on the illumination of surfaces from the perspective of a painter, seeing shadows as ‘the diminution of light by the intervention of an opaque body’ and ‘the counterpart of luminous rays’. In his mind, a shadow ‘stood between light and darkness’, with darkness being ‘the absence of light’. The anthropological record provides another gateway to such enquiry, holding oral and textual evidence on the meaning of light and cast shadows in the belief systems of some cultures. In one such example, recorded in the late nineteenth century, an observed reflection of the self in water was regarded as the person’s spirit and, significantly, the shadow cast by the body was imagined as the person’s soul. And how might such phenomena have been comprehended and used in the prehistoric past? Without ethnographic evidence the answer is unknowable and any conclusions are potentially conjecture. Researchers strive to overcome such hurdles using a suite of scientific tools and reasoning, and by drawing on the diversity of architecture and art. This paper follows a similar methodological trajectory to explore the qualitative nature of these phenomena using case studies spanning five millennia.","PeriodicalId":152044,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Cosmos","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Cosmos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.0126.0201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our visual awareness relies on light acting on the eye to perceive materiality and colour. Medieval thought wrestled to articulate and comprehend its nature. The notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci, for example, included his descriptions to define light and make comparisons so as to differentiate between light and shadow. His focus was on the illumination of surfaces from the perspective of a painter, seeing shadows as ‘the diminution of light by the intervention of an opaque body’ and ‘the counterpart of luminous rays’. In his mind, a shadow ‘stood between light and darkness’, with darkness being ‘the absence of light’. The anthropological record provides another gateway to such enquiry, holding oral and textual evidence on the meaning of light and cast shadows in the belief systems of some cultures. In one such example, recorded in the late nineteenth century, an observed reflection of the self in water was regarded as the person’s spirit and, significantly, the shadow cast by the body was imagined as the person’s soul. And how might such phenomena have been comprehended and used in the prehistoric past? Without ethnographic evidence the answer is unknowable and any conclusions are potentially conjecture. Researchers strive to overcome such hurdles using a suite of scientific tools and reasoning, and by drawing on the diversity of architecture and art. This paper follows a similar methodological trajectory to explore the qualitative nature of these phenomena using case studies spanning five millennia.
我们的视觉意识依赖于光作用于眼睛来感知物质和颜色。中世纪的思想努力阐明和理解它的本质。例如,列奥纳多·达·芬奇(Leonardo Da Vinci)的笔记本就包括了他对光的定义和对比的描述,以区分光和影。他专注于从画家的角度对表面的照明,将阴影视为“通过不透明物体的干预而减少的光”和“发光光线的对应物”。在他的脑海中,一个阴影“站在光明与黑暗之间”,而黑暗就是“没有光”。人类学记录为这种调查提供了另一种途径,它持有关于光的意义的口头和文字证据,并在某些文化的信仰体系中投下阴影。在19世纪晚期记录的一个这样的例子中,观察到的自我在水中的反映被认为是人的精神,值得注意的是,身体投下的影子被想象成人的灵魂。这些现象在史前时期是如何被理解和利用的呢?没有人种学的证据,答案是不可知的,任何结论都可能是猜测。研究人员利用一套科学工具和推理,并利用建筑和艺术的多样性,努力克服这些障碍。本文遵循类似的方法轨迹,利用跨越五千年的案例研究来探索这些现象的定性本质。