Empirical Comparison of Deep Neural Networks for Brain Vessel Segmentation

Tuğçe Koçak, M. Aydın, Berna Kiraz
{"title":"Empirical Comparison of Deep Neural Networks for Brain Vessel Segmentation","authors":"Tuğçe Koçak, M. Aydın, Berna Kiraz","doi":"10.1109/UBMK52708.2021.9559015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examination, monitoring and analysis of structural changes in the blood vessels of the brain enable the observation of brain functions. Therefore, the segmentation of the entire cerebral vascular network (including the capillaries) is of great importance in terms of the relevant specialist’s opinion on the diagnosis and treatment of a disease. When performed manuall, segmentation of the vascular network of the brain is a long time-consuming and fault-tolerant process. The automatic segmentation of the brain microvascular structure with machine learning approaches eliminates the need for specialists, and provides a method for perfroming cerebral vessel segmentation in a short time. This study provides the empirical comparision of three different deep neural network models including autoencoder, U-Net and ResNet+U-Net for the vascular network segmentation of brain vessels. The experiments are conducted on vesseINN dataset, which is a volumetric cerebrovascular system dataset obtained by two-photon microscopy. The models are evaluated based on accuracy, f1-score, recall, and precision metrics. During the training phase, U-Net and ResNet+Unet achieve 98% accuracy. Auto-encoder, on the other hand, yields 95% accuracy. In the test phase, it is observed that U-Net and ResNet+U-Net models give better results than the autoencoder model, according to the results obtained with 97% accuracy for U-Net and ResNet+Unet networks and 95% accuracy for autoencoder.","PeriodicalId":106516,"journal":{"name":"2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK52708.2021.9559015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Examination, monitoring and analysis of structural changes in the blood vessels of the brain enable the observation of brain functions. Therefore, the segmentation of the entire cerebral vascular network (including the capillaries) is of great importance in terms of the relevant specialist’s opinion on the diagnosis and treatment of a disease. When performed manuall, segmentation of the vascular network of the brain is a long time-consuming and fault-tolerant process. The automatic segmentation of the brain microvascular structure with machine learning approaches eliminates the need for specialists, and provides a method for perfroming cerebral vessel segmentation in a short time. This study provides the empirical comparision of three different deep neural network models including autoencoder, U-Net and ResNet+U-Net for the vascular network segmentation of brain vessels. The experiments are conducted on vesseINN dataset, which is a volumetric cerebrovascular system dataset obtained by two-photon microscopy. The models are evaluated based on accuracy, f1-score, recall, and precision metrics. During the training phase, U-Net and ResNet+Unet achieve 98% accuracy. Auto-encoder, on the other hand, yields 95% accuracy. In the test phase, it is observed that U-Net and ResNet+U-Net models give better results than the autoencoder model, according to the results obtained with 97% accuracy for U-Net and ResNet+Unet networks and 95% accuracy for autoencoder.
深度神经网络用于脑血管分割的经验比较
对大脑血管结构变化的检查、监测和分析使观察大脑功能成为可能。因此,整个脑血管网(包括毛细血管)的分割对于相关专科医生对疾病的诊断和治疗的意见具有重要意义。人工分割脑血管网络是一个耗时长、容错大的过程。利用机器学习方法对大脑微血管结构进行自动分割,消除了对专家的需要,为在短时间内进行脑血管分割提供了一种方法。本研究对autoencoder、U-Net和ResNet+U-Net三种不同的深度神经网络模型在脑血管血管网络分割中的应用进行了实证比较。实验在vesseINN数据集上进行,该数据集是由双光子显微镜获得的容量脑血管系统数据集。这些模型是根据准确性、f1分数、召回率和精度指标进行评估的。在训练阶段,U-Net和ResNet+Unet的准确率达到98%。另一方面,自动编码器产生95%的准确率。在测试阶段,我们观察到U-Net和ResNet+U-Net模型比自编码器模型给出了更好的结果,根据获得的结果,U-Net和ResNet+Unet网络的准确率为97%,自动编码器的准确率为95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信