Current global perspectives on silicosis—Convergence of old and newly emergent hazards

R. Hoy, M. Jeebhay, C. Cavalin, Weihong Chen, R. Cohen, E. Fireman, L. Go, A. León-Jiménez, A. Menéndez-Navarro, Marcos Ribeiro, P. Rosental
{"title":"Current global perspectives on silicosis—Convergence of old and newly emergent hazards","authors":"R. Hoy, M. Jeebhay, C. Cavalin, Weihong Chen, R. Cohen, E. Fireman, L. Go, A. León-Jiménez, A. Menéndez-Navarro, Marcos Ribeiro, P. Rosental","doi":"10.1111/resp.14242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silicosis not a disease of the past. It is an irreversible, fibrotic lung disease specifically caused by exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) dust. Over 20,000 incident cases of silicosis were identified in 2017 and millions of workers continue to be exposed to RCS. Identified case numbers are however a substantial underestimation due to deficiencies in reporting systems and occupational respiratory health surveillance programmes in many countries. Insecure workers, immigrants and workers in small businesses are at particular risk of more intense RCS exposure. Much of the focus of research and prevention activities has been on the mining sector. Hazardous RCS exposure however occurs in a wide range of occupational setting which receive less attention, in particular the construction industry. Recent outbreaks of silicosis associated with the fabrication of domestic kitchen benchtops from high‐silica content artificial stone have been particularly notable because of the young age of affected workers, short duration of RCS exposure and often rapid disease progression. Developments in nanotechnology and hydraulic fracking provide further examples of how rapid changes in technology and industrial processes require governments to maintain constant vigilance to identify and control potential sources of RCS exposure. Despite countries around the world dealing with similar issues related to RCS exposure, there is an absence of sustained global public health response including lack of consensus of an occupational exposure limit that would provide protection to workers. Although there are complex challenges, global elimination of silicosis must remain the goal.","PeriodicalId":162871,"journal":{"name":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Silicosis not a disease of the past. It is an irreversible, fibrotic lung disease specifically caused by exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) dust. Over 20,000 incident cases of silicosis were identified in 2017 and millions of workers continue to be exposed to RCS. Identified case numbers are however a substantial underestimation due to deficiencies in reporting systems and occupational respiratory health surveillance programmes in many countries. Insecure workers, immigrants and workers in small businesses are at particular risk of more intense RCS exposure. Much of the focus of research and prevention activities has been on the mining sector. Hazardous RCS exposure however occurs in a wide range of occupational setting which receive less attention, in particular the construction industry. Recent outbreaks of silicosis associated with the fabrication of domestic kitchen benchtops from high‐silica content artificial stone have been particularly notable because of the young age of affected workers, short duration of RCS exposure and often rapid disease progression. Developments in nanotechnology and hydraulic fracking provide further examples of how rapid changes in technology and industrial processes require governments to maintain constant vigilance to identify and control potential sources of RCS exposure. Despite countries around the world dealing with similar issues related to RCS exposure, there is an absence of sustained global public health response including lack of consensus of an occupational exposure limit that would provide protection to workers. Although there are complex challenges, global elimination of silicosis must remain the goal.
当前全球对矽肺病的看法——新旧危险的汇合
矽肺病不是过去的病。它是一种不可逆的纤维化肺部疾病,具体由暴露于可吸入的结晶二氧化硅(RCS)粉尘引起。2017年发现了2万多例矽肺病事件,数百万工人继续暴露在RCS中。然而,由于许多国家的报告系统和职业呼吸健康监测规划存在缺陷,已确定的病例数被严重低估。没有安全感的工人、移民和小型企业的工人尤其容易受到更严重的RCS影响。研究和预防活动的大部分重点放在采矿部门。然而,危险的RCS暴露发生在广泛的职业环境中,但很少受到关注,特别是建筑行业。由于受影响工人年龄小,接触RCS的时间短,而且通常病情进展迅速,最近爆发的矽肺病与用高硅含量人造石制造家庭厨房工作台有关。纳米技术和水力压裂技术的发展提供了进一步的例子,说明技术和工业过程的快速变化如何要求政府保持不断的警惕,以识别和控制潜在的RCS暴露源。尽管世界各国都在处理与RCS接触有关的类似问题,但缺乏持续的全球公共卫生应对措施,包括对可为工人提供保护的职业接触限值缺乏共识。尽管面临着复杂的挑战,但全球消除矽肺病必须仍然是我们的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信