A Framework for Measuring Software Obfuscation Resilience against Automated Attacks

Sebastian Banescu, Martín Ochoa, A. Pretschner
{"title":"A Framework for Measuring Software Obfuscation Resilience against Automated Attacks","authors":"Sebastian Banescu, Martín Ochoa, A. Pretschner","doi":"10.1109/SPRO.2015.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software obfuscation of programs, with the goal of protecting against attackers having physical access to the machine executing them, is a common practice motivated by the necessity of keeping intellectual property (such as business critical algorithms) and critical data (such as cryptographic keys) secret. However, as of today, it is unclear how secure popular obfuscation operators are relative to each other or to other protection techniques. In this paper we propose a formal framework to characterize attacker models and guarantees, inspired by similar notions from cryptography. We then map prior work in the area of deobfuscation to our formal model to the possible extent. We also perform a case-study about using symbolic execution for deobfuscation, concretely mapped onto our formal model.","PeriodicalId":338591,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Protection","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPRO.2015.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Software obfuscation of programs, with the goal of protecting against attackers having physical access to the machine executing them, is a common practice motivated by the necessity of keeping intellectual property (such as business critical algorithms) and critical data (such as cryptographic keys) secret. However, as of today, it is unclear how secure popular obfuscation operators are relative to each other or to other protection techniques. In this paper we propose a formal framework to characterize attacker models and guarantees, inspired by similar notions from cryptography. We then map prior work in the area of deobfuscation to our formal model to the possible extent. We also perform a case-study about using symbolic execution for deobfuscation, concretely mapped onto our formal model.
测量软件混淆抗自动攻击弹性的框架
软件混淆程序的目的是防止攻击者对执行程序的机器进行物理访问,这是一种常见的做法,其动机是需要保持知识产权(如业务关键算法)和关键数据(如加密密钥)的机密性。然而,到目前为止,还不清楚流行的混淆操作相对于彼此或其他保护技术的安全性如何。在本文中,我们提出了一个形式化框架来描述攻击者模型和保证,灵感来自密码学的类似概念。然后,我们将消除混淆领域的先前工作映射到我们的正式模型中,以达到可能的程度。我们还执行了一个关于使用符号执行去混淆的案例研究,具体映射到我们的形式模型上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信