Liberatory Design Thinking for Equity-Centered Instructional Design: A Systems Thinking Analysis

Arpita Pal
{"title":"Liberatory Design Thinking for Equity-Centered Instructional Design: A Systems Thinking Analysis","authors":"Arpita Pal","doi":"10.59668/722.13026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As per the National Equity Project, any system that produces inequities, injustices, and inequalities is often a product of design. Research has shown that systemic inequity often results from the design process and can rupture the power balance producing inequitable relationships in the social justice arena (NEP, n.d.). Systems design in K-12, higher education, and other organizational or workplace contexts are crucial to empower every learner with equitable opportunities or create more inequities. The historical data shows that systemic inequities were intentionally designed with oppression as the goal; hence the importance of equity-centered systems design justice becomes indispensable for producing equitable learning experiences for everyone (NEP, n.d.). Equity-centered systems design is pivotal in dismantling systems of oppression and empowering people of color, people with disability, the LGBTQ+ community, the indigenous, and other marginalized communities. \nUsing the liberatory design thinking framework, instructional designers can recognize individual, institutional, and structural inequities and create opportunities to produce equitable learning experiences for learners. An equity-centered liberatory design thinking approach can support instructional designers in identifying and addressing the problems of inequities in an existing system. By considering the ethos and strategies necessary to center equity by design, instructional designers can provide a platform and opportunity for all stakeholders to practice converging and divergent thinking. Furthermore, the needs and beliefs about learning design as they ideate solutions grounded in the experiences of people from diverse backgrounds, especially people with disability, the LGBTQ+ community, the indigenous, and other marginalized communities. (Khalil, 2020). \n","PeriodicalId":298668,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Applied Instructional Design","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Applied Instructional Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59668/722.13026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As per the National Equity Project, any system that produces inequities, injustices, and inequalities is often a product of design. Research has shown that systemic inequity often results from the design process and can rupture the power balance producing inequitable relationships in the social justice arena (NEP, n.d.). Systems design in K-12, higher education, and other organizational or workplace contexts are crucial to empower every learner with equitable opportunities or create more inequities. The historical data shows that systemic inequities were intentionally designed with oppression as the goal; hence the importance of equity-centered systems design justice becomes indispensable for producing equitable learning experiences for everyone (NEP, n.d.). Equity-centered systems design is pivotal in dismantling systems of oppression and empowering people of color, people with disability, the LGBTQ+ community, the indigenous, and other marginalized communities. Using the liberatory design thinking framework, instructional designers can recognize individual, institutional, and structural inequities and create opportunities to produce equitable learning experiences for learners. An equity-centered liberatory design thinking approach can support instructional designers in identifying and addressing the problems of inequities in an existing system. By considering the ethos and strategies necessary to center equity by design, instructional designers can provide a platform and opportunity for all stakeholders to practice converging and divergent thinking. Furthermore, the needs and beliefs about learning design as they ideate solutions grounded in the experiences of people from diverse backgrounds, especially people with disability, the LGBTQ+ community, the indigenous, and other marginalized communities. (Khalil, 2020).
以公平为中心的教学设计的解放设计思维:系统思维分析
根据国家公平项目,任何产生不公平、不公正和不平等的制度通常都是设计的产物。研究表明,系统性不平等往往源于设计过程,并可能破坏权力平衡,在社会正义领域产生不公平的关系(NEP, n.d)。K-12、高等教育和其他组织或工作环境中的系统设计对于赋予每个学习者公平的机会或创造更多的不平等至关重要。历史数据表明,系统性的不平等是故意设计的,以压迫为目标;因此,以公平为中心的系统设计正义的重要性对于为每个人创造公平的学习体验变得不可或缺(NEP, n.d)。以公平为中心的系统设计对于拆除压迫系统并赋予有色人种、残疾人、LGBTQ+社区、土著和其他边缘化社区权力至关重要。使用解放设计思维框架,教学设计师可以认识到个人、机构和结构上的不平等,并创造机会为学习者提供公平的学习体验。以公平为中心的解放设计思维方法可以帮助教学设计师识别和解决现有系统中的不公平问题。通过考虑以设计为中心的公平所必需的精神和策略,教学设计师可以为所有利益相关者提供一个平台和机会来实践趋同和发散思维。此外,学习设计的需求和信念是基于不同背景的人,特别是残疾人、LGBTQ+社区、土著和其他边缘化社区的经验来构想解决方案的。(Khalil, 2020)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信