Demand Disagreement

C. Heyerdahl-Larsen, P. Illeditsch
{"title":"Demand Disagreement","authors":"C. Heyerdahl-Larsen, P. Illeditsch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3092366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a weak correlation between economic fundamentals and asset returns and disagreement about future asset prices is not spanned by disagreement about economic fundamentals. Both facts are inconsistent with leading asset pricing models. To address these puzzles, we develop an overlapping generations model with disagreement about the cross-sectional distribution of investors’ preferences and beliefs. This disagreement implies different beliefs about future asset demand even if economic fundamentals are known. Demand disagreement leads to a low correlation between asset returns and economic fundamentals (no “correlation puzzle“) and disagreement about returns that is not spanned by beliefs about economic fundamentals (no “disagreement correlation puzzle“). Demand disagreement explains important asset pricing facts such as excess stock market volatility, low means and volatilities of interest rates, valuation ratios predicting returns, Black’s leverage effect, and high trading volume unrelated to economic fundamentals, even in a setting with i.i.d. consumption growth and without hedging demands, recursive preferences, habit formation, or disaster risk.","PeriodicalId":330048,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3092366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is a weak correlation between economic fundamentals and asset returns and disagreement about future asset prices is not spanned by disagreement about economic fundamentals. Both facts are inconsistent with leading asset pricing models. To address these puzzles, we develop an overlapping generations model with disagreement about the cross-sectional distribution of investors’ preferences and beliefs. This disagreement implies different beliefs about future asset demand even if economic fundamentals are known. Demand disagreement leads to a low correlation between asset returns and economic fundamentals (no “correlation puzzle“) and disagreement about returns that is not spanned by beliefs about economic fundamentals (no “disagreement correlation puzzle“). Demand disagreement explains important asset pricing facts such as excess stock market volatility, low means and volatilities of interest rates, valuation ratios predicting returns, Black’s leverage effect, and high trading volume unrelated to economic fundamentals, even in a setting with i.i.d. consumption growth and without hedging demands, recursive preferences, habit formation, or disaster risk.
需求的分歧
经济基本面与资产回报之间存在弱相关性,对未来资产价格的分歧并不会被对经济基本面的分歧所跨越。这两个事实都与主流资产定价模型不符。为了解决这些难题,我们开发了一个重叠代模型,该模型对投资者偏好和信念的横截面分布存在分歧。这种分歧意味着,即使经济基本面是已知的,人们对未来资产需求的看法也是不同的。需求分歧导致资产回报与经济基本面之间的低相关性(不存在“相关性难题”),而对回报的分歧不受经济基本面信念的影响(不存在“差异相关性难题”)。需求不一致解释了重要的资产定价事实,如股市的过度波动、利率的低均值和波动性、预测回报的估值比率、布莱克的杠杆效应,以及与经济基本面无关的高交易量,即使在消费增长、没有对冲需求、递归偏好、习惯形成或灾难风险的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信