Income Tax Treaty Policy in the 21st Century: Residence vs. Source

Bret Wells, C. Lowell
{"title":"Income Tax Treaty Policy in the 21st Century: Residence vs. Source","authors":"Bret Wells, C. Lowell","doi":"10.7916/D8Q23ZM1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States has repeatedly attempted to stop tax base erosion for almost the entire post-World War I era, and yet the same problems exist today. The need for fundamental tax reform is front-page material in the major newspapers with the US transfer pricing rules and US multinationals portrayed as public enemy #1. The OECD this month issued a report entitled “Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting,” and in a competing fashion several important developing countries have initiated their own pact to develop cooperative strategies on these issues outside of the framework of the OECD and UN. The attached manuscript studies the historical record and sets forth a competing model for dealing with these matters which pre-dated the existing model treaties and transfer pricing paradigm. This earlier paradigm was offered by the International Chamber of Commerce’s but was prematurely abandoned by the League of Nations in favor of the existing paradigm. In light of the fact that the existing paradigm has failed so miserably, the earlier proposal should be re-considered. In the inevitable re-examination process, there will be a fascinating range of political, economic, and business issues to be addressed. Tax administrations will need to ascertain how their resources could be redeployed to foster economic growth. MNEs will need to assess the impact of new treaty concepts on their global effective tax rate planning models. The critical question is who will initiate the evolution to come. All countries are anxious to protect their respective tax bases. At the present time, it appears that the BRICS and Source Countries have planted their stake in the sand, rejecting the existing order and declaring an intention to update the rules that apply to their own tax base defense. The OECD appears to be principally driven by the need to defend its Member country tax bases, hoping, no doubt, that BRICS and Source Countries will ultimately follow its lead. Whichever organization emerges as the new-found thought leader on these questions, it is now time to give the original International Chamber of Commerce recommendation a fair consideration on its merits (which, interestingly, addresses the current concerns of BRICS and Source Countries).","PeriodicalId":183854,"journal":{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Houston Law Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8Q23ZM1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The United States has repeatedly attempted to stop tax base erosion for almost the entire post-World War I era, and yet the same problems exist today. The need for fundamental tax reform is front-page material in the major newspapers with the US transfer pricing rules and US multinationals portrayed as public enemy #1. The OECD this month issued a report entitled “Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting,” and in a competing fashion several important developing countries have initiated their own pact to develop cooperative strategies on these issues outside of the framework of the OECD and UN. The attached manuscript studies the historical record and sets forth a competing model for dealing with these matters which pre-dated the existing model treaties and transfer pricing paradigm. This earlier paradigm was offered by the International Chamber of Commerce’s but was prematurely abandoned by the League of Nations in favor of the existing paradigm. In light of the fact that the existing paradigm has failed so miserably, the earlier proposal should be re-considered. In the inevitable re-examination process, there will be a fascinating range of political, economic, and business issues to be addressed. Tax administrations will need to ascertain how their resources could be redeployed to foster economic growth. MNEs will need to assess the impact of new treaty concepts on their global effective tax rate planning models. The critical question is who will initiate the evolution to come. All countries are anxious to protect their respective tax bases. At the present time, it appears that the BRICS and Source Countries have planted their stake in the sand, rejecting the existing order and declaring an intention to update the rules that apply to their own tax base defense. The OECD appears to be principally driven by the need to defend its Member country tax bases, hoping, no doubt, that BRICS and Source Countries will ultimately follow its lead. Whichever organization emerges as the new-found thought leader on these questions, it is now time to give the original International Chamber of Commerce recommendation a fair consideration on its merits (which, interestingly, addresses the current concerns of BRICS and Source Countries).
21世纪所得税协定政策:居住地与来源
在第一次世界大战后的几乎整个时期,美国都在反复尝试阻止税基侵蚀,但今天同样的问题依然存在。需要进行根本性的税收改革是各大报纸的头版新闻,美国的转让定价规则和美国跨国公司被描绘成头号公敌。经合组织本月发布了一份题为“解决税基侵蚀和利润转移”的报告,以一种竞争的方式,几个重要的发展中国家已经启动了自己的协议,在经合组织和联合国框架之外就这些问题制定合作战略。所附的手稿研究了历史记录,并提出了一个竞争性的模型来处理这些问题,这些问题早于现有的示范条约和转让定价范式。这个早期的范例是由国际商会提出的,但国际联盟过早地放弃了现有的范例。鉴于现有的范例已经惨败,应该重新考虑先前的建议。在不可避免的重新审查过程中,将有一系列令人着迷的政治、经济和商业问题需要解决。税务管理部门将需要确定如何重新配置其资源以促进经济增长。跨国公司将需要评估新的条约概念对其全球有效税率规划模式的影响。关键的问题是谁将发起即将到来的进化。所有国家都急于保护各自的税基。目前,金砖国家和来源国似乎已经在沙子里埋下了自己的赌注,拒绝现有秩序,并宣布有意更新适用于自己税基防御的规则。经合组织似乎主要是出于捍卫其成员国税基的需要,毫无疑问,它希望金砖国家和税收来源国最终能效仿它的做法。无论哪个组织成为这些问题的新思想领袖,现在都是时候对国际商会最初的建议进行公平考虑了(有趣的是,它解决了金砖国家和来源国目前的担忧)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信