Navigating the Evidence: Communicating Canadian Health Policy in the Media

K. O'Grady, N. Roos, Shannon Turczak, Robert L. Brown, H. Chochinov, Nicole F. Bernier, V. Menec, B. Mount, D. Contandriopoulos, M. Perroux, R. Mcmurtry, L. di Matteo, C. Flood, M. Grignon, R. Lavergne, K. McGrail, Don Dick, L. Woodhouse, H. Lazar, L. Hedden, M. Barer, F. Béland, Michael J. Schull, M. Stabile, R. Meili, M. Dutt, S. Duckett, J. Millar, L. Rothman, G. Bloch, L. Ford-jones, J. McCormack, P. Allison, Danyaal Raza, M. Brownell, Nathan C. Nickel, S. Driedger, A. Cassels, Charles Wright, M. Offringa, T. Klassen, S. Morgan, K. Smolina, J. Lexchin, M. Gagnon, D. Juurlink, Danielle Martin, S. Shanker, Justin Joschko, Gerald Giesbrecth, P. Kurdyak, D. Goldbloom, J. Sareen, Stephanie L. Leon, M. Cappelli, J. Heymann, D. Barthold, T. Lieberman
{"title":"Navigating the Evidence: Communicating Canadian Health Policy in the Media","authors":"K. O'Grady, N. Roos, Shannon Turczak, Robert L. Brown, H. Chochinov, Nicole F. Bernier, V. Menec, B. Mount, D. Contandriopoulos, M. Perroux, R. Mcmurtry, L. di Matteo, C. Flood, M. Grignon, R. Lavergne, K. McGrail, Don Dick, L. Woodhouse, H. Lazar, L. Hedden, M. Barer, F. Béland, Michael J. Schull, M. Stabile, R. Meili, M. Dutt, S. Duckett, J. Millar, L. Rothman, G. Bloch, L. Ford-jones, J. McCormack, P. Allison, Danyaal Raza, M. Brownell, Nathan C. Nickel, S. Driedger, A. Cassels, Charles Wright, M. Offringa, T. Klassen, S. Morgan, K. Smolina, J. Lexchin, M. Gagnon, D. Juurlink, Danielle Martin, S. Shanker, Justin Joschko, Gerald Giesbrecth, P. Kurdyak, D. Goldbloom, J. Sareen, Stephanie L. Leon, M. Cappelli, J. Heymann, D. Barthold, T. Lieberman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2647089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2011, we’ve worked to create a dialogue between Canada’s journalists and academic health policy experts to enrich the quality and quantity of health policy stories in the Canadian media. We work with a Media Advisory Board made up of journalists and professors of journalism from across the country who let us know what their needs, constraints and objectives are from a journalistic perspective. We also have a network of more than 80 health policy academics who are ready and available to be interviewed by the media and provide a non-partisan, evidence-based perspective from their areas of expertise.Working together, we have created a number of tools for enabling media coverage of health policy issues in Canada, including the preparation of media backgrounders, infographics, posters, podcasts and videos that highlight the evidence, and we conduct webinars, seminars and conferences by and for both journalists and academics alike.But our most successful initiative thus far has been having our academic experts authorOp-Ed articles on health policy issues — highlighting the evidence; they work with a professional editor to follow specific media guidelines, and then we publish the commentaries in the biggest media outlets across the country. The table below illustrates how successful this strategy has been and how receptive media outlets have been to these stories — increasingly so.This book is a selection of Op-Eds we’ve published in media outlets across the country (in both French and English) from October 2013 to October 2014. It thus provides a snapshot of Canadian health policy in the news. It is the third volume in our series (see also Canadian Health Policy in the News (2013) Making Evidence Matter in Canadian Health Policy (2014)) — all made available for free so that they may be read and used widely in educational settings.Topics are organized by chapter headings that address issues such as our challenges with providing Mental Health care; new models for Pharmaceutical Policy and commentaries that flag the myths and truths about our Aging Population and how it will impact health services. Health Care Costs and Spending are always a concern and are raised by many of the essays here including the costs of health human resources and technology. Many of our academics address the ways in which Health is More than Health Care including such issues as poverty, housing and education, while others caution that More Care is Not Always Better. Still other commentaries highlight the dangers and opportunities with Private, For-Profit Solutions to health care funding and delivery, and others compare Canadian and American Health Systems.Collected together, we hope these Op-Eds engage and enrich the dialogue and debate on a health care system that’s so important to Canadians. As we head into a federal election year in 2015, it seems certain that many of these issues will come to the fore, and it serves our democratic system that they be aired and discussed with evidence as the foundation. With journalists and academics in partnership to communicate health policy in the news, we can help navigate the evidence together.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2647089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2011, we’ve worked to create a dialogue between Canada’s journalists and academic health policy experts to enrich the quality and quantity of health policy stories in the Canadian media. We work with a Media Advisory Board made up of journalists and professors of journalism from across the country who let us know what their needs, constraints and objectives are from a journalistic perspective. We also have a network of more than 80 health policy academics who are ready and available to be interviewed by the media and provide a non-partisan, evidence-based perspective from their areas of expertise.Working together, we have created a number of tools for enabling media coverage of health policy issues in Canada, including the preparation of media backgrounders, infographics, posters, podcasts and videos that highlight the evidence, and we conduct webinars, seminars and conferences by and for both journalists and academics alike.But our most successful initiative thus far has been having our academic experts authorOp-Ed articles on health policy issues — highlighting the evidence; they work with a professional editor to follow specific media guidelines, and then we publish the commentaries in the biggest media outlets across the country. The table below illustrates how successful this strategy has been and how receptive media outlets have been to these stories — increasingly so.This book is a selection of Op-Eds we’ve published in media outlets across the country (in both French and English) from October 2013 to October 2014. It thus provides a snapshot of Canadian health policy in the news. It is the third volume in our series (see also Canadian Health Policy in the News (2013) Making Evidence Matter in Canadian Health Policy (2014)) — all made available for free so that they may be read and used widely in educational settings.Topics are organized by chapter headings that address issues such as our challenges with providing Mental Health care; new models for Pharmaceutical Policy and commentaries that flag the myths and truths about our Aging Population and how it will impact health services. Health Care Costs and Spending are always a concern and are raised by many of the essays here including the costs of health human resources and technology. Many of our academics address the ways in which Health is More than Health Care including such issues as poverty, housing and education, while others caution that More Care is Not Always Better. Still other commentaries highlight the dangers and opportunities with Private, For-Profit Solutions to health care funding and delivery, and others compare Canadian and American Health Systems.Collected together, we hope these Op-Eds engage and enrich the dialogue and debate on a health care system that’s so important to Canadians. As we head into a federal election year in 2015, it seems certain that many of these issues will come to the fore, and it serves our democratic system that they be aired and discussed with evidence as the foundation. With journalists and academics in partnership to communicate health policy in the news, we can help navigate the evidence together.
导航证据:在媒体上传播加拿大卫生政策
自2011年以来,我们一直致力于在加拿大记者和学术卫生政策专家之间建立对话,以丰富加拿大媒体卫生政策报道的质量和数量。我们与一个媒体顾问委员会合作,该委员会由来自全国各地的记者和新闻学教授组成,他们从新闻的角度让我们了解他们的需求、限制和目标。我们还有一个由80多名卫生政策学者组成的网络,他们随时准备接受媒体采访,并从他们的专业领域提供无党派的、基于证据的观点。通过共同努力,我们创造了一些工具,使媒体能够报道加拿大的卫生政策问题,包括编写突出证据的媒体背景资料、信息图表、海报、播客和视频,我们还为记者和学者举办网络研讨会、研讨会和会议。但迄今为止,我们最成功的举措是让我们的学术专家撰写关于卫生政策问题的专栏文章——强调证据;他们与专业编辑合作,遵循特定的媒体指导方针,然后我们在全国最大的媒体上发表评论。下表说明了这一策略的成功程度,以及媒体对这些故事的接受程度——越来越高。这本书是我们从2013年10月到2014年10月在全国各地媒体上发表的专栏文章(法文和英文)的精选。因此,它在新闻中提供了加拿大卫生政策的快照。这是我们系列的第三卷(另见新闻中的加拿大卫生政策(2013年):在加拿大卫生政策中重视证据(2014年))——所有这些都是免费提供的,以便在教育环境中广泛阅读和使用。主题按章节标题组织,解决诸如我们在提供精神卫生保健方面面临的挑战等问题;药物政策的新模式和关于人口老龄化及其将如何影响卫生服务的神话和真相的评论。卫生保健成本和支出一直是人们关注的问题,这里的许多文章都提出了这一问题,包括卫生人力资源和技术的成本。我们的许多学者讨论了健康不仅仅是医疗保健的方式,包括贫困、住房和教育等问题,而其他人则警告说,更多的医疗并不总是更好。还有一些评论强调了私营的、以营利为目的的医疗保健资金和服务解决方案的危险和机遇,还有一些评论比较了加拿大和美国的医疗保健系统。总之,我们希望这些专栏能够参与并丰富对加拿大人如此重要的医疗保健系统的对话和辩论。随着我们进入2015年的联邦选举年,其中许多问题似乎肯定会浮出水面,以证据为基础进行宣传和讨论,这有利于我们的民主制度。通过记者和学者合作,在新闻中传播卫生政策,我们可以帮助共同驾驭证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信