AAAprawda. Telemetria prawdy

Tomasz Michaluk
{"title":"AAAprawda. Telemetria prawdy","authors":"Tomasz Michaluk","doi":"10.14746/h.2019.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developed societies are not interested in the truth. The demand for truth has disappeared while its causal role has been marginalized and limited to the authentication of identity in banking systems and social media. Exactly a century earlier, due to due to fallibilism or falsificationism, science rejected the Cartesian conception of Absolute truth, while retaining its objectivity although not the stability of its findings. Today, we intersecting worlds, but not identical in values. The reason for this is not the inability to work out a common research method but an axiological redefinition, which often comes down to the question: truth and so what?","PeriodicalId":312956,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/h.2019.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developed societies are not interested in the truth. The demand for truth has disappeared while its causal role has been marginalized and limited to the authentication of identity in banking systems and social media. Exactly a century earlier, due to due to fallibilism or falsificationism, science rejected the Cartesian conception of Absolute truth, while retaining its objectivity although not the stability of its findings. Today, we intersecting worlds, but not identical in values. The reason for this is not the inability to work out a common research method but an axiological redefinition, which often comes down to the question: truth and so what?
发达社会对真相不感兴趣。对真相的需求已经消失,而其因果作用已经被边缘化,仅限于银行系统和社交媒体的身份认证。整整一个世纪以前,由于可错论或证伪论,科学拒绝了笛卡尔的绝对真理概念,同时保留了它的客观性,尽管不是其发现的稳定性。今天,我们的世界相交,但价值观并不相同。这样做的原因不是无法制定出一种通用的研究方法,而是一种价值论的重新定义,这往往归结为一个问题:真理,那又怎样?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信