Articulatory Prosody: A comparison of Mandarin Chinese and Japanese

D. Erickson
{"title":"Articulatory Prosody: A comparison of Mandarin Chinese and Japanese","authors":"D. Erickson","doi":"10.21437/tai.2021-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a synopsis of a series of research studies previously reported about articulatory prosody, based on jaw displacement data collected from Mandarin Chinese and Japanese speakers using electromagnetic articulography (EMA). On one hand, Mandarin Chinese has tone contrast while Japanese has pitch accents. However, the experimental data suggest that in terms of articulatory prosody, they are similar. The term ‘articulatory prosody” as discussed here is used to describe prosodically-motivated jaw displacement patterns. Both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese have final and initial phrasal stress, implemented by increased jaw displacement, and the jaw displacement patterns seem to be independent of the F0 contours of the tones/pitch accents. Acoustically, both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese show F1 increases with increased jaw displacement; Mandarin Chinese also shows increased duration. The results suggest that for both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese, it is the pattern of jaw displacement that provides the underlying prosodic framework of phrase-initial and phrase-final stress, resulting in increased F1 for (the low vowel /a/) in both languages, and increased duration for Mandarin Chinese.","PeriodicalId":145363,"journal":{"name":"1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/tai.2021-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a synopsis of a series of research studies previously reported about articulatory prosody, based on jaw displacement data collected from Mandarin Chinese and Japanese speakers using electromagnetic articulography (EMA). On one hand, Mandarin Chinese has tone contrast while Japanese has pitch accents. However, the experimental data suggest that in terms of articulatory prosody, they are similar. The term ‘articulatory prosody” as discussed here is used to describe prosodically-motivated jaw displacement patterns. Both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese have final and initial phrasal stress, implemented by increased jaw displacement, and the jaw displacement patterns seem to be independent of the F0 contours of the tones/pitch accents. Acoustically, both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese show F1 increases with increased jaw displacement; Mandarin Chinese also shows increased duration. The results suggest that for both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese, it is the pattern of jaw displacement that provides the underlying prosodic framework of phrase-initial and phrase-final stress, resulting in increased F1 for (the low vowel /a/) in both languages, and increased duration for Mandarin Chinese.
发音韵律:汉语普通话与日语的比较
本文基于使用电磁发音仪(EMA)收集的汉语普通话和日语使用者的下颌位移数据,对发音韵律的一系列研究进行了综述。一方面,普通话有音调对比,而日语有音高口音。然而,实验数据表明,在发音韵律方面,它们是相似的。这里讨论的术语“发音韵律”是用来描述韵律驱动的下颌位移模式。普通话和日语都有短语的末重音和初重音,通过增加下颌位移来实现,并且下颌位移模式似乎与音调/音高的F0轮廓无关。在声学上,普通话和日语的F1都随着下颌位移的增加而增加;普通话的持续时间也有所增加。结果表明,对于普通话和日语来说,是下颌位移模式提供了短语-起始和短语-结束重音的潜在韵律框架,导致两种语言中(低元音/a/)的F1增加,并且普通话的持续时间增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信