Simulation Study Comparing Offshore Versus Onshore CO2 Well Blowouts

C. Oldenburg, L. Pan
{"title":"Simulation Study Comparing Offshore Versus Onshore CO2 Well Blowouts","authors":"C. Oldenburg, L. Pan","doi":"10.4043/29461-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We have simulated onshore and offshore blowouts of an idealized CO2 injection well using T2Well, a state-of-the-art coupled well-reservoir simulator. The purpose of the study is to understand dynamic multi-phase non-isothermal flow phenomena in CO2 wells to inform risk assessment studies for offshore geologic carbon sequestration sites. The scenario we chose consists of a vertical well of 3050 m length completed in a mature geologic carbon sequestration reservoir filled with CO2 connected to a horizontal surface pipe. At time zero, we assume the surface pipe was breached producing a 2-inch diameter hole. In the onshore scenario, the pipe blowout causes CO2 to enter the ambient air at 0.101325 MPa and 22.78 °C, whereas in the offshore scenario the blowout is into the water column at a depth of 50 m where pressure and temperature are 0.598 MPa and 22.78 °C, respectively. The simulations show that the overall CO2 leakage rates are very similar for the onshore and offshore scenarios, with subtle differences in flow rates of various phases likely arising from differences in pressure at the leakage point. Overall, the main differences between onshore and offshore CO2 blowouts are expected to arise mostly after discharge due to differences between how CO2 disperses in ambient air versus in the water column.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29461-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We have simulated onshore and offshore blowouts of an idealized CO2 injection well using T2Well, a state-of-the-art coupled well-reservoir simulator. The purpose of the study is to understand dynamic multi-phase non-isothermal flow phenomena in CO2 wells to inform risk assessment studies for offshore geologic carbon sequestration sites. The scenario we chose consists of a vertical well of 3050 m length completed in a mature geologic carbon sequestration reservoir filled with CO2 connected to a horizontal surface pipe. At time zero, we assume the surface pipe was breached producing a 2-inch diameter hole. In the onshore scenario, the pipe blowout causes CO2 to enter the ambient air at 0.101325 MPa and 22.78 °C, whereas in the offshore scenario the blowout is into the water column at a depth of 50 m where pressure and temperature are 0.598 MPa and 22.78 °C, respectively. The simulations show that the overall CO2 leakage rates are very similar for the onshore and offshore scenarios, with subtle differences in flow rates of various phases likely arising from differences in pressure at the leakage point. Overall, the main differences between onshore and offshore CO2 blowouts are expected to arise mostly after discharge due to differences between how CO2 disperses in ambient air versus in the water column.
比较海上和陆上二氧化碳井喷的模拟研究
我们使用最先进的耦合井-油藏模拟器T2Well模拟了理想的二氧化碳注入井的陆上和海上井喷。研究的目的是了解二氧化碳井中动态多相非等温流动现象,为海上地质固碳场所的风险评估研究提供信息。我们选择的方案包括一口3050米长的直井,该直井位于一个成熟的地质碳封存储层中,储层充满二氧化碳,并与水平地面管道相连。在时间零点,我们假设地面管道被破坏,形成了一个直径2英寸的洞。在陆上场景中,管道井喷导致CO2以0.101325 MPa和22.78℃进入环境空气,而在海上场景中,井喷进入水深50 m的水柱,压力和温度分别为0.598 MPa和22.78℃。模拟结果表明,陆地和海上的总体CO2泄漏率非常相似,不同阶段的流量可能由于泄漏点的压力差异而存在细微差异。总体而言,由于二氧化碳在环境空气中的分散方式与在水柱中的分散方式不同,预计陆上和海上二氧化碳井喷的主要差异主要出现在排放之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信