Comparative trial of immunoprophylaxis with RATG versus OKT3.

The Journal of heart transplantation Pub Date : 1990-05-01
B P Griffith, R L Kormos, J M Armitage, J S Dummer, R L Hardesty
{"title":"Comparative trial of immunoprophylaxis with RATG versus OKT3.","authors":"B P Griffith,&nbsp;R L Kormos,&nbsp;J M Armitage,&nbsp;J S Dummer,&nbsp;R L Hardesty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized trial of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (polyclonal) versus OKT3 monoclonal antibody prophylaxis was carried out in 82 heart transplant recipients, who, in addition, received baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone. One-year actuarial survival was comparable between groups (95% to 98%), but the likelihood of histologic rejection within the first 30 days of transplant was more than seven times greater in OKT3 patients (0.58/patient vs 0.08/patient). Patients receiving OKT3 were more likely to have repeated episodes of rejection, and the mean time to rejection for patients receiving OKT3 was shorter (33 days) than for patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin (67 days). At 120 days, while 52% of patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin were free of rejection, versus 37% of the OKT3 patients, the difference was not significant. There was no difference in the incidence of major or minor bacterial or viral infection between groups, but significant hemodynamic side effects were seen after the first dose of OKT3, and aseptic meningitis developed in two OKT3 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77638,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of heart transplantation","volume":"9 3 Pt 2","pages":"301-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of heart transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A randomized trial of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (polyclonal) versus OKT3 monoclonal antibody prophylaxis was carried out in 82 heart transplant recipients, who, in addition, received baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone. One-year actuarial survival was comparable between groups (95% to 98%), but the likelihood of histologic rejection within the first 30 days of transplant was more than seven times greater in OKT3 patients (0.58/patient vs 0.08/patient). Patients receiving OKT3 were more likely to have repeated episodes of rejection, and the mean time to rejection for patients receiving OKT3 was shorter (33 days) than for patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin (67 days). At 120 days, while 52% of patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin were free of rejection, versus 37% of the OKT3 patients, the difference was not significant. There was no difference in the incidence of major or minor bacterial or viral infection between groups, but significant hemodynamic side effects were seen after the first dose of OKT3, and aseptic meningitis developed in two OKT3 patients.

RATG与OKT3免疫预防的比较研究。
在82例心脏移植受者中进行了兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(多克隆)与OKT3单克隆抗体预防的随机试验,此外,这些受者还接受了环孢素、硫唑嘌呤和强的松的基线免疫抑制。两组间一年精算生存率相当(95%至98%),但OKT3患者在移植后30天内发生组织学排斥反应的可能性高出7倍以上(0.58/例vs 0.08/例)。接受OKT3治疗的患者更有可能出现反复的排斥反应,接受OKT3治疗的患者平均排斥反应时间(33天)比接受兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白治疗的患者(67天)短。在120天,虽然接受兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白治疗的患者中有52%没有排斥反应,而接受OKT3治疗的患者中有37%没有排斥反应,但差异并不显著。两组间主要或次要细菌或病毒感染的发生率无差异,但首次给药后出现明显的血流动力学副作用,2例OKT3患者出现无菌性脑膜炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信