Service capacity pooling in M/G/1 service systems

Jing Peng, O. Jouini, Y. Dallery, Z. Jemai
{"title":"Service capacity pooling in M/G/1 service systems","authors":"Jing Peng, O. Jouini, Y. Dallery, Z. Jemai","doi":"10.1109/IESM.2015.7380292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the cost-sharing problem among independent service providers in a service capacity pooling system. The effective improvement of such pooling system can be achieved by reducing the resource idleness in case of congestion. In this paper, we model both the service provider and the cooperative coalition as a single server queue. We attempt to answer the following questions: (i) which coalition strategy should be used; and (ii) which allocation rule should be selected in order to maintain the stability of the coalition? In particular, we consider the service pooling with a fixed service capacity for M/G/1 service systems. The benefit of the pooling system is due to the shortened waiting queue in the overall system. We develop the corresponding cooperative game with transferable utility, and analyze the core allocations. Although it is difficult to express a core allocation explicitly for the game, we prove the non-emptiness of the core. We give a reasonable expression of Equal Profit Method to distribute the cost for our game, and investigate a number of cost allocation rules under three typical situations to evaluate the gain of the service pooling strategy for each service provider. The numerical results show that the cost allocation rule proposed gives a reasonable cost-sharing result considering the contribution of each participant.","PeriodicalId":308675,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM)","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM.2015.7380292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We study the cost-sharing problem among independent service providers in a service capacity pooling system. The effective improvement of such pooling system can be achieved by reducing the resource idleness in case of congestion. In this paper, we model both the service provider and the cooperative coalition as a single server queue. We attempt to answer the following questions: (i) which coalition strategy should be used; and (ii) which allocation rule should be selected in order to maintain the stability of the coalition? In particular, we consider the service pooling with a fixed service capacity for M/G/1 service systems. The benefit of the pooling system is due to the shortened waiting queue in the overall system. We develop the corresponding cooperative game with transferable utility, and analyze the core allocations. Although it is difficult to express a core allocation explicitly for the game, we prove the non-emptiness of the core. We give a reasonable expression of Equal Profit Method to distribute the cost for our game, and investigate a number of cost allocation rules under three typical situations to evaluate the gain of the service pooling strategy for each service provider. The numerical results show that the cost allocation rule proposed gives a reasonable cost-sharing result considering the contribution of each participant.
M/G/1业务系统的业务容量池
研究了服务容量池系统中独立服务提供者之间的成本分担问题。这种池化系统的有效改进可以通过减少拥塞情况下的资源闲置来实现。在本文中,我们将服务提供者和合作联盟建模为单个服务器队列。我们试图回答以下问题:(i)应该使用哪种联盟策略;(二)为了保持联盟的稳定性,应该选择哪种分配规则?特别地,我们考虑了M/G/1业务系统中具有固定服务容量的业务池。合用系统的好处在于缩短了整个系统的等待队列。开发了相应的具有可转移效用的合作对策,并对核心分配进行了分析。虽然很难明确地表达游戏的核心分配,但我们证明了核心的非空性。我们给出了均利法的合理表达式来分配我们的博弈成本,并研究了三种典型情况下的成本分配规则,以评估每个服务提供商的服务池策略的收益。数值结果表明,所提出的成本分配规则在考虑各参与方贡献的情况下给出了合理的成本分担结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信