Fie Upon Your Law

D. Kornstein
{"title":"Fie Upon Your Law","authors":"D. Kornstein","doi":"10.1080/1535685X.1993.11015726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Merchant of Venice is surely the Shakespearean play most closely linked in the popular mind with law. The crucial trial scene sears the legal and popular conscience like nothing else in Shakespeare. Over the centuries, The Merchant of Venice has spawned more commentary by lawyers than any other Shakespeare play. Books and articles in large number have flowed from the busy pens of attorneys and others seeking to understand and explain the legal meaning of this play. And yet for all that has been previously written by lawyers about the play, there is still more to be said. Commentary on the legal aspects of the trial in The Merchant of Venice is divided. One critic, not a lawyer, thinks the trial scene is so controversial that each reader must decide, like a Supreme Court justice, where to stand in the conflict.' The vast majority of scholarly commentary - an eight-to-one ratio - agrees with Portia's ruling.2 For such scholars, the ruling of the court is a victory of the liberating spirit over the deadly letter of the law, of mercy over legalism, and of reasonable discretion over Shylock's demand for literal-minded justice. According to these majority commentators, Shylock gets just what he deserves - severe punishment for his miserly vengefulness. The consensus view is that the play dramatizes the struggle in Shakespeare's England for supremacy between the common law courts and the equitable Court of Chancery. The minority view disagrees with Portia's judgment.3 Those dissenters see Shylock as a victim of injustice, as the hero of the play, as shown no mercy by Portia, and as trapped by secret legalities. Rather than a fiend, Shylock strikes the minority as a tragic victim of religious and ethnic prejudice. Portia's judgment, to these contrarians, is a triumph of vengeance in the guise of justice. The more I think about The Merchant of Venice, the more I find myself in the minority camp. As the sharp split of opinion might indicate, The Merchant of Venice has a persistent and uncanny grip on human imagination. Shakespeare's play strikes at the subconscious with a force extremely rare in literature, even in classics. When Dustin Hoffman played Shylock in London and on Broadway in 1989 and 1990, it was an international cultural event. And Laurence Olivier's film version of Merchant still captivates us. Part of what makes a classic is its capacity","PeriodicalId":312913,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","volume":"2001 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1993.11015726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Merchant of Venice is surely the Shakespearean play most closely linked in the popular mind with law. The crucial trial scene sears the legal and popular conscience like nothing else in Shakespeare. Over the centuries, The Merchant of Venice has spawned more commentary by lawyers than any other Shakespeare play. Books and articles in large number have flowed from the busy pens of attorneys and others seeking to understand and explain the legal meaning of this play. And yet for all that has been previously written by lawyers about the play, there is still more to be said. Commentary on the legal aspects of the trial in The Merchant of Venice is divided. One critic, not a lawyer, thinks the trial scene is so controversial that each reader must decide, like a Supreme Court justice, where to stand in the conflict.' The vast majority of scholarly commentary - an eight-to-one ratio - agrees with Portia's ruling.2 For such scholars, the ruling of the court is a victory of the liberating spirit over the deadly letter of the law, of mercy over legalism, and of reasonable discretion over Shylock's demand for literal-minded justice. According to these majority commentators, Shylock gets just what he deserves - severe punishment for his miserly vengefulness. The consensus view is that the play dramatizes the struggle in Shakespeare's England for supremacy between the common law courts and the equitable Court of Chancery. The minority view disagrees with Portia's judgment.3 Those dissenters see Shylock as a victim of injustice, as the hero of the play, as shown no mercy by Portia, and as trapped by secret legalities. Rather than a fiend, Shylock strikes the minority as a tragic victim of religious and ethnic prejudice. Portia's judgment, to these contrarians, is a triumph of vengeance in the guise of justice. The more I think about The Merchant of Venice, the more I find myself in the minority camp. As the sharp split of opinion might indicate, The Merchant of Venice has a persistent and uncanny grip on human imagination. Shakespeare's play strikes at the subconscious with a force extremely rare in literature, even in classics. When Dustin Hoffman played Shylock in London and on Broadway in 1989 and 1990, it was an international cultural event. And Laurence Olivier's film version of Merchant still captivates us. Part of what makes a classic is its capacity
论你的律法
在大众心目中,《威尼斯商人》无疑是与法律联系最紧密的莎士比亚戏剧。在莎士比亚的作品中,这一关键的审判场面深深触动了法律和大众的良知。几个世纪以来,律师对《威尼斯商人》的评论超过了莎士比亚的任何一部戏剧。大量的书籍和文章从律师和其他人忙碌的笔中流出,试图理解和解释这部剧的法律意义。然而,尽管律师们已经写了很多关于这部剧的文章,但还有更多的东西需要说。对《威尼斯商人》中审判的法律方面的评论是有分歧的。一位不是律师的评论家认为,审判场面太有争议了,每个读者都必须像最高法院法官一样决定在冲突中站在哪一边。绝大多数的学术评论——八比一的比例——同意鲍西娅的裁决对这些学者来说,法院的裁决是解放精神战胜了致命的法律条文,是仁慈战胜了墨守成规,是合理的裁量权战胜了夏洛克要求的墨守成规的正义。根据这些多数评论家的说法,夏洛克得到了他应得的——对他吝啬的报复心的严厉惩罚。普遍的观点是,该剧戏剧化了莎士比亚时代英国普通法法院和衡平法法院之间争夺最高权力的斗争。少数人的观点不同意Portia的判断那些持不同政见者认为夏洛克是不公正的受害者,是剧中的英雄,被鲍西娅毫不留情,被秘密法律所困。夏洛克不是一个恶魔,而是一个宗教和种族偏见的悲剧受害者。对这些反对者来说,鲍西娅的判决是披着正义外衣的复仇的胜利。我越想《威尼斯商人》,就越觉得自己属于少数派阵营。正如尖锐的意见分歧可能表明的那样,《威尼斯商人》对人类的想象力有着持久而不可思议的控制。莎士比亚的戏剧以一种在文学作品中,甚至在经典作品中极为罕见的力量冲击着人们的潜意识。达斯汀·霍夫曼于1989年和1990年在伦敦和百老汇扮演夏洛克时,这是一个国际文化事件。劳伦斯·奥利弗的电影版《商人》至今仍令我们着迷。成为经典的部分原因是它的容量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信