Jun Chen, J. Gel, Brandon K. Chen, Zheng Gong, Chao Zhou, Chaoyang Shi, Changhai Ru, Huayan Pu, Yan Peng, Shaorong Xie, Yu Sun
{"title":"Automated SEM-Guided AFM Scan with Dynamically Varied Scan Speed","authors":"Jun Chen, J. Gel, Brandon K. Chen, Zheng Gong, Chao Zhou, Chaoyang Shi, Changhai Ru, Huayan Pu, Yan Peng, Shaorong Xie, Yu Sun","doi":"10.1109/MARSS.2018.8481201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ahstract- For imaging nano-scaled samples, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) represent two complementary imaging techniques. In a hybrid SEM-AFM system, a compact AFM is installed inside the high vacuum chamber of an SEM, where SEM provides largely 2D imaging and material compositions of a sample while AFM is capable of complementarily measuring 3D topography of the sample. Although SEM can achieve real-time imaging (e.g., 20 Hz), AFM scan can take minutes to generate an image, demanding strategies for speeding up AFM measurement. In existing hybrid SEM-AFM systems, SEM and AFM measurements are made independently. This paper presents, for the first time, a technique of using SEM nanoscopic imaging to guide the scan speed of AFM imaging. The dynamic variation of AFM scan speed is based on features identified in SEM imaging. Information/features are extracted from real-time SEM images and quantitated using local entropy and other metrics. The generated feature metric map is used to produce a speed map for varying AFM scan speed at each position on the sample. Experiments were conducted with a new SEM-compatible AFM instrument we recently developed, as the test bed of the SEM-guided AFM scan technique. The results for the samples measured in this work demonstrate that time savings of this technique, compared to traditional AFM scan using a constant speed, were up to 66% with equivalent imaging accuracy obtained with traditional fine scan. With the same time cost of traditional fast scan, the SEM -guided AFM scan technique had an accuracy improvement of 47%.","PeriodicalId":118389,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARSS.2018.8481201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Ahstract- For imaging nano-scaled samples, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) represent two complementary imaging techniques. In a hybrid SEM-AFM system, a compact AFM is installed inside the high vacuum chamber of an SEM, where SEM provides largely 2D imaging and material compositions of a sample while AFM is capable of complementarily measuring 3D topography of the sample. Although SEM can achieve real-time imaging (e.g., 20 Hz), AFM scan can take minutes to generate an image, demanding strategies for speeding up AFM measurement. In existing hybrid SEM-AFM systems, SEM and AFM measurements are made independently. This paper presents, for the first time, a technique of using SEM nanoscopic imaging to guide the scan speed of AFM imaging. The dynamic variation of AFM scan speed is based on features identified in SEM imaging. Information/features are extracted from real-time SEM images and quantitated using local entropy and other metrics. The generated feature metric map is used to produce a speed map for varying AFM scan speed at each position on the sample. Experiments were conducted with a new SEM-compatible AFM instrument we recently developed, as the test bed of the SEM-guided AFM scan technique. The results for the samples measured in this work demonstrate that time savings of this technique, compared to traditional AFM scan using a constant speed, were up to 66% with equivalent imaging accuracy obtained with traditional fine scan. With the same time cost of traditional fast scan, the SEM -guided AFM scan technique had an accuracy improvement of 47%.