Video-based eye tracker: A clinical tool in assessing binocular vision?

E. Irving, HC Goltz, M. Steinbach
{"title":"Video-based eye tracker: A clinical tool in assessing binocular vision?","authors":"E. Irving, HC Goltz, M. Steinbach","doi":"10.1364/vsia.1997.sua.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electro-oculogram (EOG) historically has been the most common clinically-used objective eye movement recording device. EOG is based upon the corneo-retinal potential difference1 and has many limitations2-4. More recently photoelectric techniques have been used to objectively record eye-movements. These instruments also have a limited linear range2. Eye movements can be recorded accurately using a magnetic search coil5, but this requires that a contact lens annulus containing the coil be placed on the patient's eye. The procedure tends to be time-consuming and is not well tolerated by a significant number of patients. Video technology has lead to a new generation of user and patient-friendly, non-invasive eye tracking devices. One such instrument, the El-Mar 2020 (Downsview, Ontario) eye-tracker, calculates eye rotation from the differences between the corneal reflections and the center of the pupil. This makes head stabilization unnecessary for accurate tracking, as it eliminates artifacts caused by lateral motion of the camera with respect to the head. These translation artifacts can be quite large (1 mm = 5 degrees for pupil tracking only, 1 mm = 10 degrees for corneal reflection tracking only). The system is free from drift, has a maximum resolution of 6 minutes of arc, a 120Hz sampling rate and a linear range of +/-40 and +/-30 degrees in the horizontal and vertical meridia respectively6. The instrument has been compared favorably to the magnetic search coil for oculomotor testing in humans6.","PeriodicalId":428257,"journal":{"name":"Vision Science and its Applications","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Science and its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/vsia.1997.sua.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The electro-oculogram (EOG) historically has been the most common clinically-used objective eye movement recording device. EOG is based upon the corneo-retinal potential difference1 and has many limitations2-4. More recently photoelectric techniques have been used to objectively record eye-movements. These instruments also have a limited linear range2. Eye movements can be recorded accurately using a magnetic search coil5, but this requires that a contact lens annulus containing the coil be placed on the patient's eye. The procedure tends to be time-consuming and is not well tolerated by a significant number of patients. Video technology has lead to a new generation of user and patient-friendly, non-invasive eye tracking devices. One such instrument, the El-Mar 2020 (Downsview, Ontario) eye-tracker, calculates eye rotation from the differences between the corneal reflections and the center of the pupil. This makes head stabilization unnecessary for accurate tracking, as it eliminates artifacts caused by lateral motion of the camera with respect to the head. These translation artifacts can be quite large (1 mm = 5 degrees for pupil tracking only, 1 mm = 10 degrees for corneal reflection tracking only). The system is free from drift, has a maximum resolution of 6 minutes of arc, a 120Hz sampling rate and a linear range of +/-40 and +/-30 degrees in the horizontal and vertical meridia respectively6. The instrument has been compared favorably to the magnetic search coil for oculomotor testing in humans6.
基于视频的眼动仪:评估双眼视力的临床工具?
眼电图(EOG)历来是临床上最常用的客观眼动记录设备。EOG是基于角膜-视网膜电位差1,有许多局限性。最近光电技术被用来客观地记录眼球运动。这些仪器也有一个有限的线性范围。使用磁搜索线圈可以准确地记录眼球运动,但这需要在患者的眼睛上放置一个含有磁搜索线圈的隐形眼镜环。这一过程往往是耗时的,而且很多患者不能很好地耐受。视频技术导致了新一代的用户和患者友好,无创眼动追踪设备。El-Mar 2020 (Downsview, Ontario)眼动仪就是这样一种仪器,它通过角膜反射和瞳孔中心之间的差异来计算眼球旋转。这使得头部稳定不需要精确跟踪,因为它消除了由相机相对于头部的横向运动引起的伪影。这些平移伪影可能相当大(仅瞳孔跟踪时1毫米= 5度,仅角膜反射跟踪时1毫米= 10度)。该系统无漂移,最大分辨率为6分弧,采样率为120Hz,水平和垂直子午线的线性范围分别为+/-40度和+/-30度6。该仪器已被认为与用于人类眼球运动测试的磁搜索线圈相比具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信