Trascendiendo textos y contextos: metodología para investigar polémicas mediáticas

Tania Chappi Docurro
{"title":"Trascendiendo textos y contextos: metodología para investigar polémicas mediáticas","authors":"Tania Chappi Docurro","doi":"10.24265/cian.2023.n17.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the review and interpretation of theoretical-methodological assumptions related to social communication, journalism, controversy, content analysis in the mass media (MCM) and ideological discourse, this article bases a methodology to investigate media controversies in printed publications, the which is applicable to controversies that circulate in digital media, adapting to the peculiarities of these the variable corresponding to the presentation of the materials involved in the dispute. This proposal allows registering the context of the controversy submitted to scrutiny, its relevance, themes; the characteristics, ideologies and proceeding of the actors; the structuring of the discursive space that the medium grants (location, genres, paratexts); the depth of the debate, its language, tone and resources; its typology; the functions it fulfills; the scope and repercussion within the Communication and Social System. Likewise, it makes it possible to verify the reception that the controversy in question has had in the public sphere.","PeriodicalId":220572,"journal":{"name":"Correspondencias & Análisis","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Correspondencias & Análisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24265/cian.2023.n17.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the review and interpretation of theoretical-methodological assumptions related to social communication, journalism, controversy, content analysis in the mass media (MCM) and ideological discourse, this article bases a methodology to investigate media controversies in printed publications, the which is applicable to controversies that circulate in digital media, adapting to the peculiarities of these the variable corresponding to the presentation of the materials involved in the dispute. This proposal allows registering the context of the controversy submitted to scrutiny, its relevance, themes; the characteristics, ideologies and proceeding of the actors; the structuring of the discursive space that the medium grants (location, genres, paratexts); the depth of the debate, its language, tone and resources; its typology; the functions it fulfills; the scope and repercussion within the Communication and Social System. Likewise, it makes it possible to verify the reception that the controversy in question has had in the public sphere.
超越文本和语境:调查媒体争议的方法
本文通过对社会传播、新闻、争议、大众媒体内容分析和意识形态话语等相关理论方法论假设的回顾和解释,建立了一种研究印刷出版物媒体争议的方法,该方法适用于在数字媒体中传播的争议。适应这些特点的变量对应于争议中涉及的材料的呈现。该提案允许记录提交审查的争议的背景、相关性、主题;行为主体的特征、意识形态和行为方式;媒介赋予话语空间的结构(地点、体裁、文本);辩论的深度、语言、语气和资源;其类型学;它实现的功能;传播与社会系统的范围和影响。同样,它也使人们有可能核实有关争议在公共领域的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信