Comparative Study of Elman Neural Network (ENN) and Neural Network Autoregressive With Exogenous Input (NARX) For Flood Forecasting

Siti Maisarah Zainorzuli, Syahrul Afzal Che Abdullah, R. Adnan, F. Ruslan
{"title":"Comparative Study of Elman Neural Network (ENN) and Neural Network Autoregressive With Exogenous Input (NARX) For Flood Forecasting","authors":"Siti Maisarah Zainorzuli, Syahrul Afzal Che Abdullah, R. Adnan, F. Ruslan","doi":"10.1109/ISCAIE.2019.8743796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flood happen when a river ruptures its bank due to massive amount of water and the water spills out onto the land. Therefore, flood prediction system is necessary in order to alert the people about the incoming flood. Flood cannot be preventing but can take the precaution steps by using a precise technique to forecast the flood earlier. In this modern day, there are many models of flood prediction was introduced to the world. The accuracy of water level is very crucial for flood forecasting. By compare all the models, the most accurate technique can be discovered. In Malaysia, NARX and ENN are the flood prediction models that were frequently be used by researches. Thus, this paper proposed comparison between Elman Neural Network (ENN) and Neural Network Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (NARX) to specify which model are more accurate. Therefore, both of the model is using the same water level data which recorded in Kedah to ensure which model are more precise. Based on result obtain, Elman are more accurate than NARX since it have higher best fit and lower root mean square error (RMSE).","PeriodicalId":369098,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 9th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 9th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2019.8743796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Flood happen when a river ruptures its bank due to massive amount of water and the water spills out onto the land. Therefore, flood prediction system is necessary in order to alert the people about the incoming flood. Flood cannot be preventing but can take the precaution steps by using a precise technique to forecast the flood earlier. In this modern day, there are many models of flood prediction was introduced to the world. The accuracy of water level is very crucial for flood forecasting. By compare all the models, the most accurate technique can be discovered. In Malaysia, NARX and ENN are the flood prediction models that were frequently be used by researches. Thus, this paper proposed comparison between Elman Neural Network (ENN) and Neural Network Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (NARX) to specify which model are more accurate. Therefore, both of the model is using the same water level data which recorded in Kedah to ensure which model are more precise. Based on result obtain, Elman are more accurate than NARX since it have higher best fit and lower root mean square error (RMSE).
Elman神经网络(ENN)与带外源输入的神经网络自回归(NARX)在洪水预报中的比较研究
洪水发生时,河流决堤,由于大量的水溢出到陆地上。因此,洪水预报系统是必要的,它可以提醒人们洪水即将来临。洪水不能预防,但可以采取预防措施,通过使用精确的技术来提前预测洪水。在这个现代,有许多洪水预测模型被介绍给世界。水位的准确性对洪水预报至关重要。通过对所有模型的比较,可以发现最精确的技术。在马来西亚,研究人员经常使用的洪水预测模型是NARX和ENN。因此,本文提出将Elman Neural Network (ENN)与Neural Network Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (NARX)进行比较,以确定哪种模型更准确。因此,这两个模型都使用了在吉打州记录的相同的水位数据,以确保哪个模型更精确。从得到的结果来看,Elman比NARX更准确,因为它具有更高的最佳拟合和更低的均方根误差(RMSE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信