Perceptions of Early Childhood Preservice Teachers on Early Childhood Education Undergraduate Program Courses

Arif Yılmaz, Nevra Atış Akyol, Şifa Kevser Çakmak, Esra Tuğba Çoban Söylemez
{"title":"Perceptions of Early Childhood Preservice Teachers on Early Childhood Education Undergraduate Program Courses","authors":"Arif Yılmaz, Nevra Atış Akyol, Şifa Kevser Çakmak, Esra Tuğba Çoban Söylemez","doi":"10.31704/ijocis.2022.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to find out the contribution of general culture (GC), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and content knowledge (CK) courses to the professional development of preservice teachers in early childhood education programs. As a part of a mix-method research study, this survey uses a rank-order judgment methodology. Using a two-stage-cluster and random sampling - 432 students from 35 universities participated in the study during the 2018-2019 academic year. Data were gathered using an “Early Childhood Education Undergraduate Program Course Evaluation Form” and analyzed using pairwise comparison. With reference to the results, “Effective Communication” was chosen as the most beneficial one among the GC courses, and “Statistics” was selected as the least beneficial course. In addition, among the PK courses, “Teaching Practice I” was the most beneficial one, and “Assessment and Evaluation” was the least helpful course related to student perceptions. While the “Introduction to Early Childhood Education” course was the most beneficial course among the CK, “Research Project II” was listed as the least beneficial course. It was found that students’ opinions about courses did not change concerning their gender, academic achievement, and the type of high school they had attended.","PeriodicalId":149650,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2022.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to find out the contribution of general culture (GC), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and content knowledge (CK) courses to the professional development of preservice teachers in early childhood education programs. As a part of a mix-method research study, this survey uses a rank-order judgment methodology. Using a two-stage-cluster and random sampling - 432 students from 35 universities participated in the study during the 2018-2019 academic year. Data were gathered using an “Early Childhood Education Undergraduate Program Course Evaluation Form” and analyzed using pairwise comparison. With reference to the results, “Effective Communication” was chosen as the most beneficial one among the GC courses, and “Statistics” was selected as the least beneficial course. In addition, among the PK courses, “Teaching Practice I” was the most beneficial one, and “Assessment and Evaluation” was the least helpful course related to student perceptions. While the “Introduction to Early Childhood Education” course was the most beneficial course among the CK, “Research Project II” was listed as the least beneficial course. It was found that students’ opinions about courses did not change concerning their gender, academic achievement, and the type of high school they had attended.
幼儿职前教师对幼儿教育本科专业课程的看法
摘要本研究旨在探讨一般文化(GC)、教学知识(PK)及内容知识(CK)课程对幼儿教育职前教师专业发展之贡献。作为混合方法研究的一部分,本调查采用了秩序判断方法。2018-2019学年,来自35所大学的432名学生参与了这项研究,采用了两阶段聚类和随机抽样的方法。采用《幼儿教育本科专业课程评估表》收集数据,采用两两比较方法进行分析。综合研究结果,GC课程中“有效沟通”是最有利的课程,“统计学”是最不利的课程。此外,在PK课程中,“教学实践1”对学生感知的帮助最大,“评估与评价”对学生感知的帮助最小。“幼儿教育概论”课程是CK中最有益的课程,“研究项目二”课程被列为最不有益的课程。研究发现,学生对课程的看法并没有因为他们的性别、学业成绩和所上高中的类型而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信