Cuts or thresholds, what is the best reduction method in fuzzy formal concept analysis?

M. E. Cornejo, J. Medina, Eloísa Ramírez-Poussa
{"title":"Cuts or thresholds, what is the best reduction method in fuzzy formal concept analysis?","authors":"M. E. Cornejo, J. Medina, Eloísa Ramírez-Poussa","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7337990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently α-cut irreducible and δ1δ2-multi-adjoint concept lattices have been introduced as two different methodologies focus on reducing the size of a given fuzzy concept lattice. The philosophy of both methodologies is completely different and so, the obtained lattices too. This paper analyzes the differences and proposes that the best is to combine both methodologies in order to obtain new procedures to reduce the information retrieval, only considering the important information for the user and with the advantages of both philosophies.","PeriodicalId":185191,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7337990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recently α-cut irreducible and δ1δ2-multi-adjoint concept lattices have been introduced as two different methodologies focus on reducing the size of a given fuzzy concept lattice. The philosophy of both methodologies is completely different and so, the obtained lattices too. This paper analyzes the differences and proposes that the best is to combine both methodologies in order to obtain new procedures to reduce the information retrieval, only considering the important information for the user and with the advantages of both philosophies.
切量或阈值,模糊形式概念分析中的最佳约简方法是什么?
近年来引入了α-切不可约概念格和δ1 - δ2-多伴随概念格作为两种不同的方法来减小给定模糊概念格的大小。这两种方法的原理是完全不同的,所以得到的格也是完全不同的。本文分析了这两种方法的不同之处,并提出最好是将两种方法结合起来,在只考虑对用户重要的信息的情况下,利用两种方法的优点,以获得新的方法来减少信息检索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信