[Possibilities and limitations of the automatic analysis of sleep stages using the Oxford system].

S Obergottsberger, J Zeitlhofer, N Mayr, E Marschnigg, L Deecke
{"title":"[Possibilities and limitations of the automatic analysis of sleep stages using the Oxford system].","authors":"S Obergottsberger,&nbsp;J Zeitlhofer,&nbsp;N Mayr,&nbsp;E Marschnigg,&nbsp;L Deecke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>34 ambulatory polygraphic sleep-records of young adults were carried out using the Oxford Medilog 9000 recorder. All of the records underwent automatic evaluation by the Oxford Sleep Stager. 10 cases were, in addition, evaluated visually. 4 records could not be analyzed because of artifacts. Thus, 30 subjects were used in the end for establishing standard values of sleep parameters. Automatic versus automatic comparisons and automatic versus visual comparisons of ten polysomnograms were performed epoch-by-epoch. The automatic versus automatic comparison showed agreement in 85.5% of epochs, and the automatic versus visual comparison in 70.4% of epochs. The Sleep Stager showed the best agreement with the visual evaluation in epoch-by-epoch comparison in the REM-stage (93.9%), the worst in stage 1 (32.4%). In calculating the percentages of total night sleep for the respective sleep stages, the automatic analysis showed strongest disagreement with visual evaluation in the REM-stage (plus 7.5%) and in stage 2 (minus 5.2%).</p>","PeriodicalId":75812,"journal":{"name":"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete","volume":"21 1","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

34 ambulatory polygraphic sleep-records of young adults were carried out using the Oxford Medilog 9000 recorder. All of the records underwent automatic evaluation by the Oxford Sleep Stager. 10 cases were, in addition, evaluated visually. 4 records could not be analyzed because of artifacts. Thus, 30 subjects were used in the end for establishing standard values of sleep parameters. Automatic versus automatic comparisons and automatic versus visual comparisons of ten polysomnograms were performed epoch-by-epoch. The automatic versus automatic comparison showed agreement in 85.5% of epochs, and the automatic versus visual comparison in 70.4% of epochs. The Sleep Stager showed the best agreement with the visual evaluation in epoch-by-epoch comparison in the REM-stage (93.9%), the worst in stage 1 (32.4%). In calculating the percentages of total night sleep for the respective sleep stages, the automatic analysis showed strongest disagreement with visual evaluation in the REM-stage (plus 7.5%) and in stage 2 (minus 5.2%).

[使用Oxford系统自动分析睡眠阶段的可能性和局限性]。
使用牛津Medilog 9000记录仪对34名年轻人进行了动态多测睡眠记录。所有记录均由牛津睡眠分期自动评估,另外10例进行目测评估。4 .由于工件的原因,无法分析记录。因此,最终选取了30名受试者建立睡眠参数标准值。自动与自动比较,自动与视觉比较10个多导睡眠图逐时代进行。自动对比与自动对比在85.5%的年代吻合,自动对比与视觉对比在70.4%的年代吻合。睡眠阶段与眼动期视觉评价逐期比较吻合度最高(93.9%),第一阶段最差(32.4%)。在计算各个睡眠阶段的夜间总睡眠百分比时,自动分析显示在快速眼动阶段(加7.5%)和第二阶段(减5.2%)视觉评估最不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信