In vitro evaluation of flexibility of newer splints

Gandrala Yaswanthi, C. Kumar, V. Rao
{"title":"In vitro evaluation of flexibility of newer splints","authors":"Gandrala Yaswanthi, C. Kumar, V. Rao","doi":"10.19177/JRD.V5E62017113-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the flexibility of three different splints and to determine their  peak load failure in fracture pattern. Material and Methods: Three different splints (wire-composite, single layer fibre glass and fibre reinforced Everstik splint) were adapted to the extracted Human incisors, placed in a non-rigid fashion on the experimental dental models designed for the study. Stress analysis was conducted on the test specimens by applying both static axial and  45⁰ oblique force with linear increasing intensity ranging from 0-50N and 0-30N respectively both with and without splints using universal testing machine. For each loading direction, the energy required to modify the position of the teeth at increasing applied forces was recorded for specimens with and without splints and the difference between two values (∆E) was determined, which corresponds to the rigidity of the materials. Results: For both axial and oblique tests, fibre reinforced splint had shown least ∆E values (0.02±0.08 in axial, 0.01±4.05 in oblique) while wire-composite had shown highest ∆E values (0.67±2.56 in axial, 1.42±5.16 in oblique). Conclusions: Fibre reinforced splint could be an  ideal alternative for splinting traumatized teeth, as it exhibits a lower energy variation needed for deformation and conducive to optimal periodontal healing during immobilization.","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"771 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/JRD.V5E62017113-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the flexibility of three different splints and to determine their  peak load failure in fracture pattern. Material and Methods: Three different splints (wire-composite, single layer fibre glass and fibre reinforced Everstik splint) were adapted to the extracted Human incisors, placed in a non-rigid fashion on the experimental dental models designed for the study. Stress analysis was conducted on the test specimens by applying both static axial and  45⁰ oblique force with linear increasing intensity ranging from 0-50N and 0-30N respectively both with and without splints using universal testing machine. For each loading direction, the energy required to modify the position of the teeth at increasing applied forces was recorded for specimens with and without splints and the difference between two values (∆E) was determined, which corresponds to the rigidity of the materials. Results: For both axial and oblique tests, fibre reinforced splint had shown least ∆E values (0.02±0.08 in axial, 0.01±4.05 in oblique) while wire-composite had shown highest ∆E values (0.67±2.56 in axial, 1.42±5.16 in oblique). Conclusions: Fibre reinforced splint could be an  ideal alternative for splinting traumatized teeth, as it exhibits a lower energy variation needed for deformation and conducive to optimal periodontal healing during immobilization.
新型夹板柔韧性的体外评价
目的:本研究的目的是比较三种不同的夹板的灵活性,并确定它们在骨折模式下的峰值载荷失效。材料和方法:将三种不同的夹板(金属丝复合夹板、单层玻璃纤维夹板和纤维增强everstick夹板)用于提取的人类门牙,以非刚性方式放置在为研究设计的实验牙模型上。在有夹板和没有夹板的情况下,使用万能试验机对试件施加静态轴向和45⁰斜力,分别在0-50N和0-30N范围内线性增加强度,对试件进行应力分析。对于每个加载方向,记录有夹板和没有夹板的试样在施加的力增加时改变牙齿位置所需的能量,并确定两个值之间的差(∆E),这对应于材料的刚度。结果:在轴向和斜向试验中,纤维增强夹板的∆E值最小(轴向为0.02±0.08,斜向为0.01±4.05),而金属丝复合材料的∆E值最高(轴向为0.67±2.56,斜向为1.42±5.16)。结论:纤维增强夹板是一种理想的选择夹板损伤牙齿,因为它显示出较低的能量变化所需的变形和有利于最佳的牙周愈合在固定期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信