Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Berlandaskan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Penggunaan Diskresi

Muhammad Aziz Zaelani, I. Handayani, Isharyanto Isharyanto
{"title":"Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Berlandaskan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Penggunaan Diskresi","authors":"Muhammad Aziz Zaelani, I. Handayani, Isharyanto Isharyanto","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to answer two problems: first, classifying and describing the antinomy of discretionary regulation in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration; and secondly, carrying out the construction on AUPB that has been filtered with Pancasila. Antinomy is the root of the conflict between freedom and responsibility. In this paper, antinomy is used as a way of thinking to examine the legality of limiting discretion. This is a doctrinal legal research. The sources information used in the study are primary legal materials (relevant regulations and documents) to be further analysed in a qualitative manner. Conceptual, historical and comparative law approaches are used to help solve problem formulations. The results showed that first, the antinomy that is governed under Law No. 30 of 2014 is irrelevant to the rule of law principles, thus creating confusion in the praxis realm of of the government; Second, the construction of a regulation is needed to formulate AUPB based on Pancasila as the basis for regulating discretion.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to answer two problems: first, classifying and describing the antinomy of discretionary regulation in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration; and secondly, carrying out the construction on AUPB that has been filtered with Pancasila. Antinomy is the root of the conflict between freedom and responsibility. In this paper, antinomy is used as a way of thinking to examine the legality of limiting discretion. This is a doctrinal legal research. The sources information used in the study are primary legal materials (relevant regulations and documents) to be further analysed in a qualitative manner. Conceptual, historical and comparative law approaches are used to help solve problem formulations. The results showed that first, the antinomy that is governed under Law No. 30 of 2014 is irrelevant to the rule of law principles, thus creating confusion in the praxis realm of of the government; Second, the construction of a regulation is needed to formulate AUPB based on Pancasila as the basis for regulating discretion.
本研究旨在回答两个问题:一是对2014年第30号《政府行政法》中自由裁量管制的矛盾进行分类和描述;其次,在用Pancasila过滤过的AUPB上进行施工。二律背反是自由与责任冲突的根源。本文运用二律背反的思维方式来考察限制自由裁量权的合法性。这是一项理论法学研究。研究中使用的来源信息是主要的法律材料(有关条例和文件),将进一步进行定性分析。概念、历史和比较法的方法被用来帮助解决问题的表述。结果表明,第一,2014年第30号法所规定的矛盾与法治原则无关,从而造成了政府实践领域的混乱;其次,需要构建一套法规,以潘卡西拉为基础制定AUPB,作为规范自由裁量权的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信