University Student Attitudes Towards Peer Review in EFL Writing: A Quantitative Study

Brett Morgan, Bjorn Fuisting, Jeremy White
{"title":"University Student Attitudes Towards Peer Review in EFL Writing: A Quantitative Study","authors":"Brett Morgan, Bjorn Fuisting, Jeremy White","doi":"10.5746/LEIA/14/V5/I1/A08/MORGAN_FUISTING_WHITE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quantitative study investigates student attitudes and teacher perceptions regarding peer review in EFL writing at a Japanese university. Prior research has suggested numerous benefits from employing peer review in L2 settings, but some studies have indicated learner difficulties with peer review. A total of 125 first-year students undertook a peer review activity and completed preand post-activity surveys concerned with how their attitudes changed throughout the process. Results showed that students’ enjoyment of writing and students’ willingness to offer and accept critical feedback increased. Furthermore, students showed confidence in their peers’ abilities to give feedback, but greatly doubted their own abilities. Additionally, 36 instructors completed surveys regarding their perceptions of students’ peer review attitudes, showing that teachers overestimated students’ discomfort in giving and receiving written feedback. Implications include the need for learner training and confidence building and greater teacher awareness of students’ views towards peer review. Peer review in writing activities has become a common feature of many L2 writing classrooms that employ a process-writing approach (Hyland & Hyland, 2006). Peer review, which in this paper refers to the process of students editing for mistakes and giving formative feedback on other students’ writing, provides writers with alternative sources of feedback to their teachers’. Theoretical support for the use of peer review is found in Vygotsky’s (1978) social-constructivist learning theory, which posits that social interaction is an essential component of cognitive development, and in collaborative learning theory, which contends that learners benefit from peer interaction and dialogue and the pooling of resources to complete tasks they may find too difficult on their own (Hirvela, 1999). With the myriad pedagogical possibilities offered by the employment of peer review, many EFL / ESL programs are including peer review in their writing curriculums (Hyland & Hyland, 2006). It is therefore prudent for educators to examine how to effectively implement this learning tool in their educational contexts. Language Education in Asia, 2014, 5(1), 93-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/14/V5/I1/A08/Morgan_Fuisting_White","PeriodicalId":263152,"journal":{"name":"Language Education in Asia","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Education in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/14/V5/I1/A08/MORGAN_FUISTING_WHITE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This quantitative study investigates student attitudes and teacher perceptions regarding peer review in EFL writing at a Japanese university. Prior research has suggested numerous benefits from employing peer review in L2 settings, but some studies have indicated learner difficulties with peer review. A total of 125 first-year students undertook a peer review activity and completed preand post-activity surveys concerned with how their attitudes changed throughout the process. Results showed that students’ enjoyment of writing and students’ willingness to offer and accept critical feedback increased. Furthermore, students showed confidence in their peers’ abilities to give feedback, but greatly doubted their own abilities. Additionally, 36 instructors completed surveys regarding their perceptions of students’ peer review attitudes, showing that teachers overestimated students’ discomfort in giving and receiving written feedback. Implications include the need for learner training and confidence building and greater teacher awareness of students’ views towards peer review. Peer review in writing activities has become a common feature of many L2 writing classrooms that employ a process-writing approach (Hyland & Hyland, 2006). Peer review, which in this paper refers to the process of students editing for mistakes and giving formative feedback on other students’ writing, provides writers with alternative sources of feedback to their teachers’. Theoretical support for the use of peer review is found in Vygotsky’s (1978) social-constructivist learning theory, which posits that social interaction is an essential component of cognitive development, and in collaborative learning theory, which contends that learners benefit from peer interaction and dialogue and the pooling of resources to complete tasks they may find too difficult on their own (Hirvela, 1999). With the myriad pedagogical possibilities offered by the employment of peer review, many EFL / ESL programs are including peer review in their writing curriculums (Hyland & Hyland, 2006). It is therefore prudent for educators to examine how to effectively implement this learning tool in their educational contexts. Language Education in Asia, 2014, 5(1), 93-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/14/V5/I1/A08/Morgan_Fuisting_White
大学生对英语写作同伴评议态度的定量研究
本定量研究调查了一所日本大学的学生对英语写作同伴评议的态度和教师的看法。先前的研究表明,在第二语言环境中采用同伴评议有很多好处,但一些研究表明,同伴评议在学习者中存在困难。共有125名一年级学生参加了一项同行评议活动,并完成了活动前后的调查,调查内容涉及他们在整个过程中态度的变化。结果表明,学生对写作的享受以及学生提供和接受批评反馈的意愿都有所增加。此外,学生对同伴的反馈能力表现出信心,但对自己的能力却有很大的怀疑。此外,36名教师完成了关于他们对学生同行评议态度的看法的调查,表明教师高估了学生在给予和接受书面反馈时的不适。影响包括需要对学习者进行培训和建立信心,以及教师更了解学生对同行评议的看法。写作活动中的同行评议已经成为许多采用过程写作方法的第二语言写作课堂的共同特征(Hyland & Hyland, 2006)。同侪评议,在本文中指的是学生对错误进行编辑,并对其他学生的写作给予形成性反馈的过程,它为作者提供了对教师的反馈的另一种来源。Vygotsky(1978)的社会建构主义学习理论认为,社会互动是认知发展的重要组成部分,而协作学习理论认为,学习者可以从同伴互动和对话中获益,并通过资源的汇集来完成他们自己可能很难完成的任务(Hirvela, 1999)。由于采用同行评议提供了无数的教学可能性,许多EFL / ESL课程将同行评议纳入其写作课程(Hyland & Hyland, 2006)。因此,对于教育工作者来说,研究如何在他们的教育环境中有效地实施这一学习工具是谨慎的。亚洲语言教育,2014,5(1),93-116。http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/14/V5/I1/A08/Morgan_Fuisting_White
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信