Therapeutic effect and safety of ozone therapy in sars cov-2 patients. Cuban experience

Silvia Menéndez-Cepero
{"title":"Therapeutic effect and safety of ozone therapy in sars cov-2 patients. Cuban experience","authors":"Silvia Menéndez-Cepero","doi":"10.7203/jo3t.6.7.2022.25980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SARS-Cov2, the virus causing COVID-19, is distributed globally since December 2019, classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The virus is known to cause Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Cytokine storm is considered to be one of the major causes of ARDS and multiple-organ failure. Due to the high lethality of SARS-CoV2 infections and its economic and social impact, it is necessary to seek new therapeutic procedures. It has been demonstrated that ozone therapy produces a significant improvement in blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues. Also, ozone can achieve an equilibrium between Nrf2 and NF-?B factors, modulating oxidative stress and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), the key antioxidant guardian in all tissues, could be critical in extinguishing the exacerbated inflammation that triggers organ failure in COVID-19. The reduced levels of GSH are clinically associated with severe disease. It is well documented that ozone activates the level of GSH. In clinical studies, ozone has a significant role in the treatment of pulmonary and vascular diseases. An exploratory, controlled, open and monocentric study was carried out in 32 patients with mild to moderate symptoms, distributed at random in two groups of 16 patients each. The first group received rectal ozone therapy (ozone concentration between 25 and 40 mg/L and volume between 100 and 200 ml, twice per day) together with conventional treatment with Kaletra Lopinavir/Ritonavir), chloroquine and/or Heberferon®, and the second group only conventional treatment. The result of the RT-PCR and the evolution of the clinical signs were the primary efficacy variables. Secondary efficacy variables were ferritin, C-reactive protein, oxidative stress biomarkers, cellular indicators of inflammation, biochemical and hematological variables, and the presence of adverse effects. Patients (81%) who received rectal ozone therapy had a negative RT-PCR after the tenth ozone therapy application (after 5 days), with significant differences from the control group at the same time. In all patients, improvements in the levels of C-reactive protein and cellular indicators of inflammation were achieved at the end of the treatment. Ozone treatment significantly increases GSH levels compared to the control group, but not other REDOX markers. The treatments were safe and welltolerated. \nAlso, a pilot, open-label, phase IV clinical trial study was performed in 40 SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patients (with symptoms extending beyond three weeks since negative PCR test) distributed at random into 2 groups. One group was treated with BIOPLA (dietary complement based on a concentrated protein - mineral elaborated from human placental after born, 1 capsule of 400 mg during 30 days) and the ozone group treated with rectal ozone application (ozone concentration between 20 and 35 mg/L and volume between 150 and 200 ml, 20 sessions, one per day) + BIOPLA. Both groups were treated and followed for one month. Twenty individuals supposedly healthy were enrolled and evaluated as the control group. \nEffect evaluation showed beneficial improvement in both treated groups resulting in 85% of patients for BIOPLA plus RIO3T and 37% for BIOPLA (p","PeriodicalId":137241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ozone Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ozone Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/jo3t.6.7.2022.25980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SARS-Cov2, the virus causing COVID-19, is distributed globally since December 2019, classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The virus is known to cause Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Cytokine storm is considered to be one of the major causes of ARDS and multiple-organ failure. Due to the high lethality of SARS-CoV2 infections and its economic and social impact, it is necessary to seek new therapeutic procedures. It has been demonstrated that ozone therapy produces a significant improvement in blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues. Also, ozone can achieve an equilibrium between Nrf2 and NF-?B factors, modulating oxidative stress and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), the key antioxidant guardian in all tissues, could be critical in extinguishing the exacerbated inflammation that triggers organ failure in COVID-19. The reduced levels of GSH are clinically associated with severe disease. It is well documented that ozone activates the level of GSH. In clinical studies, ozone has a significant role in the treatment of pulmonary and vascular diseases. An exploratory, controlled, open and monocentric study was carried out in 32 patients with mild to moderate symptoms, distributed at random in two groups of 16 patients each. The first group received rectal ozone therapy (ozone concentration between 25 and 40 mg/L and volume between 100 and 200 ml, twice per day) together with conventional treatment with Kaletra Lopinavir/Ritonavir), chloroquine and/or Heberferon®, and the second group only conventional treatment. The result of the RT-PCR and the evolution of the clinical signs were the primary efficacy variables. Secondary efficacy variables were ferritin, C-reactive protein, oxidative stress biomarkers, cellular indicators of inflammation, biochemical and hematological variables, and the presence of adverse effects. Patients (81%) who received rectal ozone therapy had a negative RT-PCR after the tenth ozone therapy application (after 5 days), with significant differences from the control group at the same time. In all patients, improvements in the levels of C-reactive protein and cellular indicators of inflammation were achieved at the end of the treatment. Ozone treatment significantly increases GSH levels compared to the control group, but not other REDOX markers. The treatments were safe and welltolerated. Also, a pilot, open-label, phase IV clinical trial study was performed in 40 SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patients (with symptoms extending beyond three weeks since negative PCR test) distributed at random into 2 groups. One group was treated with BIOPLA (dietary complement based on a concentrated protein - mineral elaborated from human placental after born, 1 capsule of 400 mg during 30 days) and the ozone group treated with rectal ozone application (ozone concentration between 20 and 35 mg/L and volume between 150 and 200 ml, 20 sessions, one per day) + BIOPLA. Both groups were treated and followed for one month. Twenty individuals supposedly healthy were enrolled and evaluated as the control group. Effect evaluation showed beneficial improvement in both treated groups resulting in 85% of patients for BIOPLA plus RIO3T and 37% for BIOPLA (p
臭氧治疗sars - cov-2患者的疗效及安全性。古巴的经验
导致COVID-19的病毒SARS-Cov2自2019年12月以来在全球分布,被世界卫生组织列为大流行。这种病毒已知会引起急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。细胞因子风暴被认为是ARDS和多器官功能衰竭的主要原因之一。由于SARS-CoV2感染的高致死率及其经济和社会影响,有必要寻求新的治疗方法。已经证明,臭氧疗法可以显著改善缺血组织的血流和氧合。此外,臭氧可以在Nrf2和NF-?B因子,调节氧化应激和促炎细胞因子的表达。还原型谷胱甘肽(GSH)是所有组织中关键的抗氧化守护者,它的水平可能对消除加剧的炎症至关重要,而炎症会引发COVID-19中的器官衰竭。谷胱甘肽水平降低在临床上与严重疾病有关。有充分的证据表明,臭氧会激活谷胱甘肽的水平。在临床研究中,臭氧在肺部和血管疾病的治疗中具有重要作用。对32例轻中度症状患者进行探索性、对照性、开放性、单中心研究,随机分为两组,每组16例。第一组患者接受直肠臭氧治疗(臭氧浓度在25 - 40mg /L之间,体积在100 - 200ml之间,每天2次),同时使用卡乐特拉洛匹那韦/利托那韦、氯喹和/或Heberferon®进行常规治疗,第二组仅进行常规治疗。RT-PCR结果及临床体征演变为主要疗效指标。次要疗效变量为铁蛋白、c反应蛋白、氧化应激生物标志物、炎症细胞指标、生化和血液学变量以及是否存在不良反应。接受直肠臭氧治疗的患者(81%)在第10次臭氧治疗后(5天后)RT-PCR为阴性,与对照组同期差异有统计学意义。在所有患者中,c反应蛋白水平和炎症细胞指标在治疗结束时均有所改善。与对照组相比,臭氧处理显著增加谷胱甘肽水平,但没有其他氧化还原标志物。这些治疗是安全且耐受性良好的。此外,在40名SARS-CoV-2恢复期患者(自PCR阴性检测后症状持续超过三周)中进行了一项开放标签的试验性四期临床试验研究,随机分为两组。一组使用BIOPLA(以出生后从人胎盘中提取的浓缩蛋白质-矿物质为基础的膳食补剂,30天内1粒400 mg),臭氧组使用直肠臭氧(臭氧浓度在20 - 35 mg/L之间,体积在150 - 200 ml之间,20次,每天1次)+ BIOPLA。两组均接受治疗并随访1个月。20名被认为健康的人被纳入并作为对照组进行评估。效果评估显示,两个治疗组均有有益改善,85%的患者接受BIOPLA + RIO3T治疗,37%的患者接受BIOPLA治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信