Government Bailouts and Bank Bond Spreads: Cross-Sectional Evidence from the European Union

Benoit d’Udekem, M. V. Audenrode
{"title":"Government Bailouts and Bank Bond Spreads: Cross-Sectional Evidence from the European Union","authors":"Benoit d’Udekem, M. V. Audenrode","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3336866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the financial crisis, many governments intervened to rescue banks. Between 2007 and 2009, numerous State Aid schemes were notified to the European Commission by different Member States; only 11 were blocked. Since the crisis, European authorities have reformed their safety nets to avoid taxpayers having to step in to save banks and out of fear that bailouts may be distorting competition. We investigate whether this fear is warranted in relation to long-term wholesale funding since the EU reforms. Using an original cross-section of nearly 2,500 senior bonds issued by systemic European banks, we find that nationalized banks do not benefit from lower bond spreads compared to their peers. Our findings are identical when we instrument bail-out expectations, consistent with these expectations having dropped since the crisis. We conclude that, in good times, the new EU bank safety nets appear to have achieved their stated goals.","PeriodicalId":191513,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3336866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the financial crisis, many governments intervened to rescue banks. Between 2007 and 2009, numerous State Aid schemes were notified to the European Commission by different Member States; only 11 were blocked. Since the crisis, European authorities have reformed their safety nets to avoid taxpayers having to step in to save banks and out of fear that bailouts may be distorting competition. We investigate whether this fear is warranted in relation to long-term wholesale funding since the EU reforms. Using an original cross-section of nearly 2,500 senior bonds issued by systemic European banks, we find that nationalized banks do not benefit from lower bond spreads compared to their peers. Our findings are identical when we instrument bail-out expectations, consistent with these expectations having dropped since the crisis. We conclude that, in good times, the new EU bank safety nets appear to have achieved their stated goals.
政府救助与银行债券息差:来自欧盟的横截面证据
在金融危机之后,许多政府进行了干预,以拯救银行。2007年至2009年期间,不同成员国向欧盟委员会通报了许多国家援助计划;只有11人被封锁。自危机爆发以来,欧洲当局改革了他们的安全网,以避免纳税人不得不介入拯救银行,同时也出于对纾困可能扭曲竞争的担忧。我们调查了自欧盟改革以来,这种担忧是否与长期批发融资有关。通过对欧洲系统性银行发行的近2500只优先债券的原始横截面分析,我们发现,与同行相比,国有化银行并没有从较低的债券利差中受益。当我们衡量纾困预期时,我们的发现是相同的,与自危机以来有所下降的预期是一致的。我们的结论是,在经济形势好的时候,新的欧盟银行安全网似乎已经实现了既定目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信