Reliability, Validity, and Preference of an Original Faces Scale for Assessing the Mood of Patients with Dentures

Yuji Kamashita, Tomomi Sonoda, Y. Kamada, Y. Nishi, E. Nagaoka
{"title":"Reliability, Validity, and Preference of an Original Faces Scale for Assessing the Mood of Patients with Dentures","authors":"Yuji Kamashita, Tomomi Sonoda, Y. Kamada, Y. Nishi, E. Nagaoka","doi":"10.2186/PRP.6.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to examine the reliability, validity, and preference of an original faces scale (original FS) for mood assessment.Methods: The original FS was evaluated by comparing it with a modified faces scale developed by Lorish and Maisiak (modified LM mean age: 68.8 years). We included 32 subjects for reliability and validity analyses, and 34 for analysis of scale preference. The test-retest reliability of the scales was determined by calculating the correlation between two assessments obtained at one-week intervals; the concurrent validity of the original FS, by calculating its correlation with VAS and the modified LM further, the original FS demonstrated the highest Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r=0.76). The concurrent validity, measured by the correlation between the original FS and VAS (r=0.70, P<0.01) and the modified L&M FS (r=0.90, P<0.01), was also established. A majority of the subjects preferred the original FS to the other scales.Conclusion: The original FS is an effective nonverbal method for conveniently assessing the mood of patients with dentures with respect to prosthetic treatment.","PeriodicalId":306414,"journal":{"name":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.6.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the reliability, validity, and preference of an original faces scale (original FS) for mood assessment.Methods: The original FS was evaluated by comparing it with a modified faces scale developed by Lorish and Maisiak (modified LM mean age: 68.8 years). We included 32 subjects for reliability and validity analyses, and 34 for analysis of scale preference. The test-retest reliability of the scales was determined by calculating the correlation between two assessments obtained at one-week intervals; the concurrent validity of the original FS, by calculating its correlation with VAS and the modified LM further, the original FS demonstrated the highest Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r=0.76). The concurrent validity, measured by the correlation between the original FS and VAS (r=0.70, P<0.01) and the modified L&M FS (r=0.90, P<0.01), was also established. A majority of the subjects preferred the original FS to the other scales.Conclusion: The original FS is an effective nonverbal method for conveniently assessing the mood of patients with dentures with respect to prosthetic treatment.
原始面孔量表评估假牙患者情绪的信度、效度和偏好
目的:本研究旨在检验原始面孔量表(原始面孔量表)用于情绪评估的信度、效度和偏好。方法:与Lorish和Maisiak编制的改良面部量表(改良面部量表平均年龄68.8岁)进行比较。我们纳入32名受试者进行信度和效度分析,34名受试者进行量表偏好分析。通过计算每隔一周获得的两次评估之间的相关性来确定量表的重测信度;原始FS的并发效度,通过进一步计算其与VAS和修正LM的相关性,原始FS的Spearman等级相关系数最高(r=0.76)。以原始FS与VAS的相关性(r=0.70, P<0.01)和改进L&M FS (r=0.90, P<0.01)衡量并发效度。与其他量表相比,大多数受试者更喜欢原始的FS量表。结论:原始FS是一种有效的非语言方法,可以方便地评估义齿治疗患者的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信