Multimodality and Hypertext: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations

J. Bateman, Tuomo Hiippala
{"title":"Multimodality and Hypertext: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations","authors":"J. Bateman, Tuomo Hiippala","doi":"10.1145/3465336.3475091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One important contribution commonly ascribed to hypertext is the ability to combine different forms of expression, and so be considered 'multimodal' (or, at least, 'multimedial'). On closer analysis, however, theorizing just what this entails has remained limited. Similarly to the situation that long held concerning 'written' texts, it is too easily assumed that different modalities, sometimes labelled with terms such as 'text' or 'image', combine 'naturally' and so users should be able to follow such combinations with relative ease. Research on literacy, particularly with respect to contemporary media configurations, has shown this assumption to be false. Constructing coherent interpretations of combinations of modalities can be far from straightforward, even when supported by good interface design; with poor design, which from the perspective of displayed 'documents' is unfortunately rather common, finding intended interpretations can present significant challenges. Now, when translated to the even more complex medial environment of hypertext, these potential problems are magnified considerably. Moreover, traditional considerations of where the 'boundaries' of hypertext might lie are now being redrawn as hypertext and the increasingly 'hyper'-connected medial world become increasingly permeable. The entire multimodal world of social media and participatory digital cultures might then be considered from a hypertext perspective, but research on hypertext itself lacks conceptual tools with the power necessary to engage with that world. Simple 'extensions' of traditional notions of hypertext are likely to prove insufficient for a full-blown account of multimodality. In this talk we address these concerns from the perspective of current developments in multimodality studies, where the starting point is communication as such, regardless of the expressive forms that are used for that communication and whether communication is mediated computationally, via interlinked artefacts and pathways, or by cross-linked practices of digital and non-digital use. In short, current medial practices demand that hypertext be seen not simply as, for example, a shift from page-based documents to video, but as a further computationally supported environment for the development and deployment of core multimodal theoretical constructs such as semiotic modes, media and genres. We introduce these concepts and show several practical examples of processing from ongoing projects with a variety of media.","PeriodicalId":325072,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465336.3475091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One important contribution commonly ascribed to hypertext is the ability to combine different forms of expression, and so be considered 'multimodal' (or, at least, 'multimedial'). On closer analysis, however, theorizing just what this entails has remained limited. Similarly to the situation that long held concerning 'written' texts, it is too easily assumed that different modalities, sometimes labelled with terms such as 'text' or 'image', combine 'naturally' and so users should be able to follow such combinations with relative ease. Research on literacy, particularly with respect to contemporary media configurations, has shown this assumption to be false. Constructing coherent interpretations of combinations of modalities can be far from straightforward, even when supported by good interface design; with poor design, which from the perspective of displayed 'documents' is unfortunately rather common, finding intended interpretations can present significant challenges. Now, when translated to the even more complex medial environment of hypertext, these potential problems are magnified considerably. Moreover, traditional considerations of where the 'boundaries' of hypertext might lie are now being redrawn as hypertext and the increasingly 'hyper'-connected medial world become increasingly permeable. The entire multimodal world of social media and participatory digital cultures might then be considered from a hypertext perspective, but research on hypertext itself lacks conceptual tools with the power necessary to engage with that world. Simple 'extensions' of traditional notions of hypertext are likely to prove insufficient for a full-blown account of multimodality. In this talk we address these concerns from the perspective of current developments in multimodality studies, where the starting point is communication as such, regardless of the expressive forms that are used for that communication and whether communication is mediated computationally, via interlinked artefacts and pathways, or by cross-linked practices of digital and non-digital use. In short, current medial practices demand that hypertext be seen not simply as, for example, a shift from page-based documents to video, but as a further computationally supported environment for the development and deployment of core multimodal theoretical constructs such as semiotic modes, media and genres. We introduce these concepts and show several practical examples of processing from ongoing projects with a variety of media.
多模态和超文本:理论和实证考虑
超文本的一个重要贡献是它能够结合不同的表达形式,因此被认为是“多模态”(或至少是“多媒体”)。然而,经过更仔细的分析,理论化这需要什么仍然是有限的。与长期以来关于“书面”文本的情况类似,人们很容易假设不同的形式,有时被贴上“文本”或“图像”等术语,“自然”地组合在一起,因此用户应该能够相对容易地遵循这些组合。对读写能力的研究,特别是对当代媒体配置的研究表明,这种假设是错误的。即使在良好的界面设计支持下,构建模态组合的连贯解释也远非直截了当;不幸的是,从显示“文档”的角度来看,糟糕的设计相当普遍,找到预期的解释可能会带来重大挑战。现在,当翻译到更复杂的超文本媒体环境时,这些潜在的问题被大大放大了。此外,传统上对超文本“边界”的思考现在正被重新划定为超文本,而越来越“超”连接的媒体世界变得越来越渗透。然后,可以从超文本的角度来考虑整个社会媒体和参与式数字文化的多模式世界,但是对超文本本身的研究缺乏具有参与该世界所需的权力的概念工具。传统超文本概念的简单“扩展”很可能不足以全面解释多模态。在本次演讲中,我们将从多模态研究的当前发展角度来解决这些问题,多模态研究的出发点是通信本身,无论用于该通信的表达形式如何,以及通信是否通过计算调解,通过相互关联的人工制品和途径,或通过交叉连接的数字和非数字使用实践。简而言之,当前的医学实践要求超文本不仅被视为从基于页面的文档到视频的转变,而且被视为一个进一步的计算支持环境,用于开发和部署核心多模态理论结构,如符号学模式、媒体和体裁。我们介绍了这些概念,并展示了几个使用各种媒体处理正在进行的项目的实际示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信