A Response to Professor Levering

Marcus Plested
{"title":"A Response to Professor Levering","authors":"Marcus Plested","doi":"10.2307/J.CTVGS0BMZ.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let me begin by paying tribute to Professor Levering's profound and perceptive paper. TI1e art of dying is something of a lost art within our con­ temporary culture. We live in a world that avoids confronting death wher­ ever possible, that treats abortion as a surgical procedure yet prolongs life almost at all costs, that drugs the dying so that they end their days not in repentance but in opiate-fueled hallucination, that sends off its loved ones in closed coffins in a mood of stimulated pseudo-celebration. Our age} as St. Nikolai Velimirovich puts it, is one of \"life without ai.m and death with­ out hope.\" Professor Levering sketches out a profotmdly Christian antidote to all this1 taking the gratitude and repentance (personal and communal) of Stephen as a paradigm for the way in which we should approach and pre­ pare for our own deaths. Professor Levering's paper is salutary in the fullest possible sense of the term. But I shall in the remainder of this paper focus on the Orthodox tmder­ standing and appropriation of the narrative of Stephen's martyrdom in the book of Acts. Stephen is, in the first instance,. rernembered as protomar­ tyr and protodeacon. It goes without saying t]iat Stephen's witness unto death has remained an inspiration and exernplar for the untold numbers of Christi.an martyrs fro1n the apostolic era down to our own. Stephen is also remembered for his being numbered among the first seven deacons appointed by tl1e apostles. It is as a deacon that he is invariably depicted within the iconographic tradition. TI1e patristic tradition contains a good deal of reflection on Stephen. A place ofhonor in this respect belongs to St. Augustine, who writes at length of the glories and miracles attendant upon the translation of the relics of St. Stephen to North Africa .. These astonishing scenes prornpt Augustine to reflect weightily on the puzzling relationship between death and life. Au­ gustine takes the miracles of healing and conversion worked by the relics","PeriodicalId":190818,"journal":{"name":"The Book of Acts","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Book of Acts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTVGS0BMZ.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Let me begin by paying tribute to Professor Levering's profound and perceptive paper. TI1e art of dying is something of a lost art within our con­ temporary culture. We live in a world that avoids confronting death wher­ ever possible, that treats abortion as a surgical procedure yet prolongs life almost at all costs, that drugs the dying so that they end their days not in repentance but in opiate-fueled hallucination, that sends off its loved ones in closed coffins in a mood of stimulated pseudo-celebration. Our age} as St. Nikolai Velimirovich puts it, is one of "life without ai.m and death with­ out hope." Professor Levering sketches out a profotmdly Christian antidote to all this1 taking the gratitude and repentance (personal and communal) of Stephen as a paradigm for the way in which we should approach and pre­ pare for our own deaths. Professor Levering's paper is salutary in the fullest possible sense of the term. But I shall in the remainder of this paper focus on the Orthodox tmder­ standing and appropriation of the narrative of Stephen's martyrdom in the book of Acts. Stephen is, in the first instance,. rernembered as protomar­ tyr and protodeacon. It goes without saying t]iat Stephen's witness unto death has remained an inspiration and exernplar for the untold numbers of Christi.an martyrs fro1n the apostolic era down to our own. Stephen is also remembered for his being numbered among the first seven deacons appointed by tl1e apostles. It is as a deacon that he is invariably depicted within the iconographic tradition. TI1e patristic tradition contains a good deal of reflection on Stephen. A place ofhonor in this respect belongs to St. Augustine, who writes at length of the glories and miracles attendant upon the translation of the relics of St. Stephen to North Africa .. These astonishing scenes prornpt Augustine to reflect weightily on the puzzling relationship between death and life. Au­ gustine takes the miracles of healing and conversion worked by the relics
对利弗林教授的回应
首先,我要向利弗林教授这篇深刻而有见地的论文表示敬意。死亡的艺术在我们的当代文化中是一种失落的艺术。我们生活在一个尽可能避免面对死亡的世界,把堕胎当作外科手术,却几乎不惜一切代价延长生命,给垂死的人服用药物,让他们在鸦片刺激下的幻觉中结束自己的生命,让亲人躺在紧闭的棺材里,带着一种兴奋的虚假庆祝的心情送别。正如圣尼古拉·韦利米罗维奇所说,我们的时代是“没有人工智能的生活”。我和死亡毫无希望。”莱弗林教授为这一切勾勒出了一种深刻的基督教解药,他把斯蒂芬的感恩和忏悔(个人的和集体的)作为一种范例,告诉我们应该如何对待和准备自己的死亡。利弗林教授的论文从最充分的意义上来说是有益的。但在本文的剩余部分,我将集中讨论东正教对使徒行传中司提反殉难的叙述的理解和挪用。首先,史蒂芬是。记作原执事和原执事。不用说,司提反对死亡的见证对无数基督徒来说一直是一种鼓舞和榜样。从使徒时代一直到我们这个时代的殉道者。司提反也因为他是使徒任命的前七位执事之一而被人们记住。这是作为一个执事,他总是被描绘在图像传统。教父传统中包含了大量对司提反的反思。在这方面,圣奥古斯丁是一个值得尊敬的人,他详细地描述了圣斯蒂芬的遗物被翻译到北非后所带来的荣耀和奇迹。这些惊人的场景促使奥古斯丁认真思考生与死之间令人困惑的关系。奥古斯汀接受了圣物带来的治愈和皈依的奇迹
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信