The use of automated theorem proving for error analysis and removal in safety critical embedded system specifications

Jonathan Lockhart, C. Purdy, P. Wilsey
{"title":"The use of automated theorem proving for error analysis and removal in safety critical embedded system specifications","authors":"Jonathan Lockhart, C. Purdy, P. Wilsey","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.2017.8268802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As embedded systems increase in complexity, more and more functionality is being migrated to software. Much of the migrated software is critical to the well-being of the system and users. Thus, methods to produce high quality software are needed. Software development today focuses on taking requirements and producing software as fast as possible. Traditional methods have been augmented or replaced with new, agile methods (like SCRUM) designed to produce bits of code as quickly and cheaply as possible. Unfortunately many of these methods ignore standard testing procedures and rely on reported errors to drive corrections in future releases. Traditional methods require exhaustive testing to eliminate a majority of errors. Both processes are time intensive and in the long run cost the project more to correct errors. This paper demonstrates that errors in requirements and design can be discovered and eliminated prior to implementation with the use of automated theorem provers for formal methods. This illustration is key to saving time and costs in the software development life cycle.","PeriodicalId":306091,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.2017.8268802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As embedded systems increase in complexity, more and more functionality is being migrated to software. Much of the migrated software is critical to the well-being of the system and users. Thus, methods to produce high quality software are needed. Software development today focuses on taking requirements and producing software as fast as possible. Traditional methods have been augmented or replaced with new, agile methods (like SCRUM) designed to produce bits of code as quickly and cheaply as possible. Unfortunately many of these methods ignore standard testing procedures and rely on reported errors to drive corrections in future releases. Traditional methods require exhaustive testing to eliminate a majority of errors. Both processes are time intensive and in the long run cost the project more to correct errors. This paper demonstrates that errors in requirements and design can be discovered and eliminated prior to implementation with the use of automated theorem provers for formal methods. This illustration is key to saving time and costs in the software development life cycle.
在安全关键嵌入式系统规范中使用自动化定理证明进行错误分析和消除
随着嵌入式系统复杂性的增加,越来越多的功能被迁移到软件中。许多迁移的软件对系统和用户的健康至关重要。因此,需要生产高质量软件的方法。今天的软件开发关注于获取需求并尽可能快地生产软件。传统方法已经被新的、敏捷的方法(比如SCRUM)所增强或取代,这些方法旨在尽可能快速、廉价地生成代码。不幸的是,这些方法中的许多都忽略了标准的测试过程,并依赖于报告的错误来驱动未来版本中的更正。传统的方法需要详尽的测试来消除大多数错误。这两个过程都是时间密集型的,从长远来看,纠正错误需要花费更多的项目成本。本文证明了需求和设计中的错误可以在使用形式化方法的自动定理证明器实现之前被发现和消除。这个说明是在软件开发生命周期中节省时间和成本的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信