Prevention of infection in acute leukemia.

G Maschmeyer, S Daenen, B E de Pauw, H G de Vries-Hospers, A W Dekker, J P Donnelly, W Gaus, E Haralambie, W Kern, H Konrad
{"title":"Prevention of infection in acute leukemia.","authors":"G Maschmeyer,&nbsp;S Daenen,&nbsp;B E de Pauw,&nbsp;H G de Vries-Hospers,&nbsp;A W Dekker,&nbsp;J P Donnelly,&nbsp;W Gaus,&nbsp;E Haralambie,&nbsp;W Kern,&nbsp;H Konrad","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-74643-7_94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a randomized study comparing cotrimoxazole plus colistin with ciprofloxacin, each in combination with nonabsorbable antimycotics, the incidence of major infections in terms of septicemias and pneumonias as well as of minor infections and episodes of unexplained fever (FUO) was higher in patients treated with ciprofloxacin. In cases of microbiologically documented infections, gram-positive cocci dominated by far. In surveillance cultures of oral washings and of feces, gram-negative enterobacteria were only rarely detected; however, large numbers of cultures were positive for Acinetobacter species. There were four cases of documented Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients not receiving cotrimoxazole. The incidence of documented mycotic infections as well as the detection of fungi in surveillance cultures was similar in both treatment groups. A decrease in the number of adverse events, especially of allergic reactions, could not be achieved by the administration of ciprofloxacin. In conclusion, cotrimoxazole plus colistin in combination with nonabsorbable antimycotics remains the standard regimen for prevention of infection in patients with acute leukemia undergoing aggressive remission induction therapy. A detailed analysis of study II will be prepared for publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12936,"journal":{"name":"Haematology and blood transfusion","volume":"33 ","pages":"525-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematology and blood transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74643-7_94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In a randomized study comparing cotrimoxazole plus colistin with ciprofloxacin, each in combination with nonabsorbable antimycotics, the incidence of major infections in terms of septicemias and pneumonias as well as of minor infections and episodes of unexplained fever (FUO) was higher in patients treated with ciprofloxacin. In cases of microbiologically documented infections, gram-positive cocci dominated by far. In surveillance cultures of oral washings and of feces, gram-negative enterobacteria were only rarely detected; however, large numbers of cultures were positive for Acinetobacter species. There were four cases of documented Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients not receiving cotrimoxazole. The incidence of documented mycotic infections as well as the detection of fungi in surveillance cultures was similar in both treatment groups. A decrease in the number of adverse events, especially of allergic reactions, could not be achieved by the administration of ciprofloxacin. In conclusion, cotrimoxazole plus colistin in combination with nonabsorbable antimycotics remains the standard regimen for prevention of infection in patients with acute leukemia undergoing aggressive remission induction therapy. A detailed analysis of study II will be prepared for publication.

急性白血病感染的预防。
在一项比较复方新诺明加粘菌素与环丙沙星的随机研究中,每一种都与不可吸收的抗真菌药物联合使用,在接受环丙沙星治疗的患者中,败血症和肺炎的严重感染以及轻微感染和不明原因发热(FUO)发作的发生率更高。在微生物学记录的感染病例中,革兰氏阳性球菌占主导地位。在口腔洗液和粪便的监测培养中,革兰氏阴性肠杆菌很少被检测到;然而,大量培养对不动杆菌种类呈阳性。在未接受复方新诺明治疗的患者中,有4例卡氏肺囊虫肺炎。记录在案的真菌感染的发生率以及监测培养中真菌的检测在两个治疗组中是相似的。不良事件的减少,特别是过敏反应,不能达到的管理环丙沙星。总之,复方新诺明联合粘菌素联合不可吸收抗真菌药物仍然是急性白血病患者接受积极缓解诱导治疗时预防感染的标准方案。将编写一份关于研究二的详细分析报告供出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信