5E-Metacognitive Lesson Plan in Education: Development and Validation for Higher Secondary School Students

Venkateswar Meher, Dr. Rajashree Baral
{"title":"5E-Metacognitive Lesson Plan in Education: Development and Validation for Higher Secondary School Students","authors":"Venkateswar Meher, Dr. Rajashree Baral","doi":"10.23887/ijerr.v5i1.44247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metacognition is an individual's ability to apply, and experience previously acquired to operate knowledge related to learning. This study aimed to develop 5E metacognitive RPP (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate) in education and validate 5E metacognitive RPP with expert judgment. This type of research is development research. The research subject is a content validity expert. The test subjects were students in high school. The methods used in collecting data are interviews and questionnaires. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. Questionnaires are used to collect data in the form of data provided by experts. The technique used in analyzing the data is descriptive qualitative, and quantitative analysis. Content Validity Ratio (CVR) is used as a quantitative measure to understand the content validity of the developed lesson plans. The results of data analysis are based on feedback and comments from experts and students. The final lesson plans are prepared. The overall content validity ratio of the developed learning plan is 0.73. So, the CVR value ranges from 0.6 to 0.8, so it can be seen that the lesson plans have good content validity. It was concluded that it could be used to teach high school students.","PeriodicalId":107037,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v5i1.44247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metacognition is an individual's ability to apply, and experience previously acquired to operate knowledge related to learning. This study aimed to develop 5E metacognitive RPP (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate) in education and validate 5E metacognitive RPP with expert judgment. This type of research is development research. The research subject is a content validity expert. The test subjects were students in high school. The methods used in collecting data are interviews and questionnaires. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. Questionnaires are used to collect data in the form of data provided by experts. The technique used in analyzing the data is descriptive qualitative, and quantitative analysis. Content Validity Ratio (CVR) is used as a quantitative measure to understand the content validity of the developed lesson plans. The results of data analysis are based on feedback and comments from experts and students. The final lesson plans are prepared. The overall content validity ratio of the developed learning plan is 0.73. So, the CVR value ranges from 0.6 to 0.8, so it can be seen that the lesson plans have good content validity. It was concluded that it could be used to teach high school students.
教育中的e -元认知课程计划:高中生的开发与验证
元认知是个人运用先前获得的经验来操作与学习有关的知识的能力。本研究旨在发展教育中的5E元认知RPP (Engage, Explore, Explain, detailed, Evaluate),并以专家判断验证5E元认知RPP。这种类型的研究是发展研究。研究对象是一位内容效度专家。测试对象是高中学生。收集数据的方法是访谈和问卷调查。用来收集数据的工具是问卷调查。问卷调查采用专家提供数据的形式收集数据。在分析数据时使用的技术是描述性、定性和定量分析。内容效度比率(Content Validity Ratio, CVR)是衡量教案内容效度的定量指标。数据分析的结果是基于专家和学生的反馈和评论。最后的教案准备好了。制定的学习计划整体内容效度比为0.73。因此,CVR值在0.6 ~ 0.8之间,可见教案具有较好的内容效度。结论是,它可以用来教高中生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信