Formalizing sensitivity in static analysis for intrusion detection

H. Feng, Jonathon T. Giffin, Yong Huang, S. Jha, Wenke Lee, B. Miller
{"title":"Formalizing sensitivity in static analysis for intrusion detection","authors":"H. Feng, Jonathon T. Giffin, Yong Huang, S. Jha, Wenke Lee, B. Miller","doi":"10.1109/SECPRI.2004.1301324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key function of a host-based intrusion detection system is to monitor program execution. Models constructed using static analysis have the highly desirable feature that they do not produce false alarms; however, they may still miss attacks. Prior work has shown a trade-off between efficiency and precision. In particular, the more accurate models based upon pushdown automata (PDA) are very inefficient to operate due to non-determinism in stack activity. In this paper, we present techniques for determinizing PDA models. We first provide a formal analysis framework of PDA models and introduce the concepts of determinism and stack-determinism. We then present the VP-Static model, which achieves determinism by extracting information about stack activity of the program, and the Dyck model, which achieves stack-determinism by transforming the program and inserting code to expose program state. Our results show that in run-time monitoring, our models slow execution of our test programs by 1% to 135%. This shows that reasonable efficiency needs not be sacrificed for model precision. We also compare the two models and discover that deterministic PDA are more efficient, although stack-deterministic PDA require less memory.","PeriodicalId":447471,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"184","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.2004.1301324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 184

Abstract

A key function of a host-based intrusion detection system is to monitor program execution. Models constructed using static analysis have the highly desirable feature that they do not produce false alarms; however, they may still miss attacks. Prior work has shown a trade-off between efficiency and precision. In particular, the more accurate models based upon pushdown automata (PDA) are very inefficient to operate due to non-determinism in stack activity. In this paper, we present techniques for determinizing PDA models. We first provide a formal analysis framework of PDA models and introduce the concepts of determinism and stack-determinism. We then present the VP-Static model, which achieves determinism by extracting information about stack activity of the program, and the Dyck model, which achieves stack-determinism by transforming the program and inserting code to expose program state. Our results show that in run-time monitoring, our models slow execution of our test programs by 1% to 135%. This shows that reasonable efficiency needs not be sacrificed for model precision. We also compare the two models and discover that deterministic PDA are more efficient, although stack-deterministic PDA require less memory.
入侵检测静态分析中灵敏度的形式化
基于主机的入侵检测系统的一个关键功能是监控程序的执行。使用静态分析构建的模型具有非常理想的特征,即它们不会产生假警报;然而,他们仍然可能错过攻击。先前的工作已经表明了效率和精度之间的权衡。特别是,由于堆栈活动的不确定性,基于下推自动机(PDA)的更精确模型的操作效率非常低。在本文中,我们提出了确定PDA模型的技术。我们首先提供了PDA模型的形式化分析框架,并引入了决定论和堆栈决定论的概念。然后,我们提出了VP-Static模型,该模型通过提取程序的堆栈活动信息来实现确定性,以及Dyck模型,该模型通过转换程序和插入代码来暴露程序状态来实现堆栈确定性。我们的结果表明,在运行时监控中,我们的模型将测试程序的执行速度降低了1%到135%。这说明合理的效率并不需要为了模型精度而牺牲。我们还比较了两种模型,发现确定性的PDA效率更高,尽管堆栈确定性的PDA需要更少的内存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信