Redrawing Boundaries

Uttara Rangarajan
{"title":"Redrawing Boundaries","authors":"Uttara Rangarajan","doi":"10.2218/forum.28.3053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colonialism, as a material, discursive and imaginative process was based on constructing colonized territories and native populations in rigid and specific ways. Colonized territories were depicted as lush, wild and hostile, the opposite or ‘other’ to the colonizing nation. A spatial binary of civilized and ordered metropoles contrasted with unruly and disorganized colonies, marginalized and subordinated the latter. Yet, colonialism’s attempts to organize and control differences often met opposition from those who existed in ambivalent spaces that didn’t fit colonial binaries. This paper explores the work of two such authors Jean Rhys and Katherine Mansfield and argues that their writings subvert and challenge colonial boundaries by depicting spaces as fluid and heterogeneous. As white women from the colonies (Caribbean and New Zealand respectively) Rhys and Mansfield occupied liminal positions, unable to fit within colonial binaries of white and native, they were marked as inferior due to their social background as well as gender. This gave them unique insight into the patriarchal colonial system and it’s arbitrary boundaries. Focusing on Rhys’ novels Wide Sargasso Sea and Voyage in the Dark and Mansfield’s short stories 'Prelude and At The Bay', this paper examines the blurring of colonized, native and metropolitan spaces in these works. Analyzing the authors’ depiction of natural spaces, this paper further argues that Rhys and Mansfield highlight instances of colonial insecurity and expose the shaky foundations of colonial knowledge. By eschewing the male, colonizing gaze Rhys and Mansfield depict spaces as contradictory and multidimensional and in this process break down colonial walls and boundaries.","PeriodicalId":439591,"journal":{"name":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/forum.28.3053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colonialism, as a material, discursive and imaginative process was based on constructing colonized territories and native populations in rigid and specific ways. Colonized territories were depicted as lush, wild and hostile, the opposite or ‘other’ to the colonizing nation. A spatial binary of civilized and ordered metropoles contrasted with unruly and disorganized colonies, marginalized and subordinated the latter. Yet, colonialism’s attempts to organize and control differences often met opposition from those who existed in ambivalent spaces that didn’t fit colonial binaries. This paper explores the work of two such authors Jean Rhys and Katherine Mansfield and argues that their writings subvert and challenge colonial boundaries by depicting spaces as fluid and heterogeneous. As white women from the colonies (Caribbean and New Zealand respectively) Rhys and Mansfield occupied liminal positions, unable to fit within colonial binaries of white and native, they were marked as inferior due to their social background as well as gender. This gave them unique insight into the patriarchal colonial system and it’s arbitrary boundaries. Focusing on Rhys’ novels Wide Sargasso Sea and Voyage in the Dark and Mansfield’s short stories 'Prelude and At The Bay', this paper examines the blurring of colonized, native and metropolitan spaces in these works. Analyzing the authors’ depiction of natural spaces, this paper further argues that Rhys and Mansfield highlight instances of colonial insecurity and expose the shaky foundations of colonial knowledge. By eschewing the male, colonizing gaze Rhys and Mansfield depict spaces as contradictory and multidimensional and in this process break down colonial walls and boundaries.
重新划定边界
殖民主义作为一种物质的、话语的和想象的过程,其基础是以僵化的、具体的方式构建被殖民领土和土著人口。殖民地被描绘成郁郁葱葱、荒凉和充满敌意,与殖民国家相反或“他者”。文明有序的大都市与无序无序的殖民地形成鲜明对比,后者被边缘化,处于从属地位。然而,殖民主义试图组织和控制差异,却经常遭到那些存在于不符合殖民二元性的矛盾空间中的人的反对。本文探讨了两位这样的作家Jean Rhys和Katherine Mansfield的作品,并认为他们的作品通过将空间描绘为流动和异质而颠覆和挑战殖民边界。作为来自殖民地(分别是加勒比和新西兰)的白人女性,里斯和曼斯菲尔德占据着有限的地位,无法适应白人和土著的殖民二元,由于她们的社会背景和性别,她们被标记为低人一等。这让他们对父权殖民制度及其武断的边界有了独特的见解。本文以里斯的长篇小说《宽马尾藻海》、《黑暗航行》和曼斯菲尔德的短篇小说《前奏》和《在海湾》为中心,考察了这些作品中殖民地、本土和大都市空间的模糊。通过分析作者对自然空间的描述,本文进一步认为里斯和曼斯菲尔德突出了殖民地不安全的实例,暴露了殖民地知识的不稳固基础。里斯和曼斯菲尔德避开了男性的殖民凝视,将空间描绘成矛盾和多维的,并在这个过程中打破了殖民的墙壁和边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信