{"title":"Formation obstacle avoidance using RRT and constraint based programming","authors":"Fredrik Båberg, Petter Ögren","doi":"10.1109/SSRR.2017.8088131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a new way of doing formation obstacle avoidance using a combination of Constraint Based Programming (CBP) and Rapidly Exploring Random Trees (RRTs). RRT is used to select waypoint nodes, and CBP is used to move the formation between those nodes, reactively rotating and translating the formation to pass the obstacles on the way. Thus, the CBP includes constraints for both formation keeping and obstacle avoidance, while striving to move the formation towards the next waypoint. The proposed approach is compared to a pure RRT approach where the motion between the RRT waypoints is done following linear interpolation trajectories, which are less computationally expensive than the CBP ones. The results of a number of challenging simulations show that the proposed approach is more efficient for scenarios with high obstacle densities.","PeriodicalId":403881,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (SSRR)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (SSRR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSRR.2017.8088131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new way of doing formation obstacle avoidance using a combination of Constraint Based Programming (CBP) and Rapidly Exploring Random Trees (RRTs). RRT is used to select waypoint nodes, and CBP is used to move the formation between those nodes, reactively rotating and translating the formation to pass the obstacles on the way. Thus, the CBP includes constraints for both formation keeping and obstacle avoidance, while striving to move the formation towards the next waypoint. The proposed approach is compared to a pure RRT approach where the motion between the RRT waypoints is done following linear interpolation trajectories, which are less computationally expensive than the CBP ones. The results of a number of challenging simulations show that the proposed approach is more efficient for scenarios with high obstacle densities.