India Needs International Standards in Accreditation Problems in Adoption and Implementation

Naik B.M
{"title":"India Needs International Standards in Accreditation Problems in Adoption and Implementation","authors":"Naik B.M","doi":"10.26634/jsch.8.1.1913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper outlines in brief, need and importance of introducing global quality standards in accreditation, prescribed by the international agreement “Washington Accord”. This agreement is initially provisional and after scrutiny, if found fit, it is upgraded to Signatory status. It is this status which empowers students of engineering, to become internationally mobile to harness job opportunities in world market. It facilitates mutual recognition of professional qualifications and reduces barriers between nations for mobility of engineering personnel for employment, career advancement and pursuing higher education. However, there are problems in adoption and implementation. The problems are in respect of scope of the institutions which ought to include now more of research & development. Research needs to be increased with a view to enlarge student's innovation capacity and imagination to global level. The paper attempts to identify the problems and evolve possible solutions. India, to be able to fulfil its declared dream of becoming a developed nation by 2020, needs not simple professionals, but movers & shakers, technology pioneers and industry leaders of world class standard, which can come only by becoming member of the international agreement. The paper takes a note of the discussions and deliberations in World Summit on Accreditation (WOSA 2012) held in Delhi from March 25-28, 2012 and argue that now National Board of Accreditation [NBA] an autonomous body should not remain just doing inspection to measure and certify quality. But it should guide colleges to diagnose problems and give appropriate prescriptions to improve. NBA should assert and be objective enough without fear and favour, in public interest, to give signals to improve physical infrastructure and academic culture. It is understandable that to begin with only a few institutions will come up to global standards. But we must begin somewhere; the number will rise from year to year. Unaccredited institutions simultaneously may continue producing graduates, and they should be pursuing to attain international standards. International accreditation Council of Quality education and Research [IACQER] which is an organization in the world works along with the institutions to upgrade their education and research standards. Our institutions must have to associate to take guidance (Dinesh, 2012). Although HRD minister Hon Kapil Sibble in the conference speech expressed desire to make accreditation obligatory, at present juncture of time, due to inherent problems some of which are outlined below, it is difficult. In the initial stages till institutions are accredited they will have to remain unaccredited. They cannot be accredited right at birth.Younger generation is seeking increased mobility and wider access to opportunity in world market for employment, career advancement and pursuing higher studies. This necessitates adoption of international standards. Conclusions are drawn so as to enable India to join the band of developed nations.","PeriodicalId":242221,"journal":{"name":"Journal on School Educational Technology","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on School Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.8.1.1913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper outlines in brief, need and importance of introducing global quality standards in accreditation, prescribed by the international agreement “Washington Accord”. This agreement is initially provisional and after scrutiny, if found fit, it is upgraded to Signatory status. It is this status which empowers students of engineering, to become internationally mobile to harness job opportunities in world market. It facilitates mutual recognition of professional qualifications and reduces barriers between nations for mobility of engineering personnel for employment, career advancement and pursuing higher education. However, there are problems in adoption and implementation. The problems are in respect of scope of the institutions which ought to include now more of research & development. Research needs to be increased with a view to enlarge student's innovation capacity and imagination to global level. The paper attempts to identify the problems and evolve possible solutions. India, to be able to fulfil its declared dream of becoming a developed nation by 2020, needs not simple professionals, but movers & shakers, technology pioneers and industry leaders of world class standard, which can come only by becoming member of the international agreement. The paper takes a note of the discussions and deliberations in World Summit on Accreditation (WOSA 2012) held in Delhi from March 25-28, 2012 and argue that now National Board of Accreditation [NBA] an autonomous body should not remain just doing inspection to measure and certify quality. But it should guide colleges to diagnose problems and give appropriate prescriptions to improve. NBA should assert and be objective enough without fear and favour, in public interest, to give signals to improve physical infrastructure and academic culture. It is understandable that to begin with only a few institutions will come up to global standards. But we must begin somewhere; the number will rise from year to year. Unaccredited institutions simultaneously may continue producing graduates, and they should be pursuing to attain international standards. International accreditation Council of Quality education and Research [IACQER] which is an organization in the world works along with the institutions to upgrade their education and research standards. Our institutions must have to associate to take guidance (Dinesh, 2012). Although HRD minister Hon Kapil Sibble in the conference speech expressed desire to make accreditation obligatory, at present juncture of time, due to inherent problems some of which are outlined below, it is difficult. In the initial stages till institutions are accredited they will have to remain unaccredited. They cannot be accredited right at birth.Younger generation is seeking increased mobility and wider access to opportunity in world market for employment, career advancement and pursuing higher studies. This necessitates adoption of international standards. Conclusions are drawn so as to enable India to join the band of developed nations.
印度在采用和实施认证问题上需要国际标准
本文简要概述了国际协议“华盛顿协议”规定的在认证中引入全球质量标准的必要性和重要性。本协议最初是临时的,经过审查后,如果发现合适,则升级为签署状态。正是这种地位使工程专业的学生能够在国际上流动,以利用世界市场上的就业机会。它促进了专业资格的相互承认,减少了国家之间工程人员就业、职业发展和追求高等教育的流动障碍。然而,在采用和实施方面存在一些问题。问题是在机构的范围方面,现在应该包括更多的研究和发展。加大研究力度,使学生的创新能力和想象力达到全球水平。本文试图找出问题并提出可能的解决方案。印度要想实现其宣称的到2020年成为发达国家的梦想,需要的不仅仅是专业人士,而是世界一流水平的推动者、技术先驱和行业领袖,而这只有通过成为国际协议的成员才能实现。本文记录了2012年3月25日至28日在德里举行的世界认证峰会(WOSA 2012)上的讨论和审议,并认为现在国家认证委员会(NBA)不应该仅仅是一个独立的机构,只做质量测量和认证的检查。但它应该引导高校发现问题,并给出相应的改进方案。为了公众利益,NBA应该坚持和保持足够的客观,没有恐惧和偏袒,发出改善物理基础设施和学术文化的信号。可以理解的是,一开始只有少数机构会达到全球标准。但我们必须从某个地方开始;这个数字将逐年上升。未经认证的院校可以同时继续培养毕业生,他们应该努力达到国际标准。国际质量教育与研究认证委员会(IACQER)是一个世界性的组织,它与教育机构一起提高他们的教育和研究标准。我们的机构必须联合起来接受指导(Dinesh, 2012)。虽然人力资源与发展部长Kapil Sibble在会议发言中表示希望强制认证,但在目前的时间点,由于固有的问题,其中一些问题概述如下,这是困难的。在机构获得认证之前的初始阶段,它们必须保持未认证状态。他们不能一出生就被认可。年轻一代正在寻求更多的流动性和更广泛的机会在世界市场上就业,职业发展和追求更高的学习。这就需要采用国际标准。得出结论是为了使印度能够加入发达国家的行列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信