A surface-based metric for registration error quantification

N. Nanayakkara, B. Chiu, A. Fenster
{"title":"A surface-based metric for registration error quantification","authors":"N. Nanayakkara, B. Chiu, A. Fenster","doi":"10.1109/ICIINFS.2009.5429837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In medical image registration, the quantification of registration errors is important in deciding the capabilities of a registration technique for a given problem, and/or for a given pair of images. The most common approach is the geometrical registration error called Target Registration Error (TRE) that measures the distance between corresponding landmarks in the target and registered images. However, finding sufficient number of corresponding landmarks is not always possible in medical images, and therefore, other measures such as, image similarity measures and surface-based error metrics have been used in quantification of registration errors. Surface-based error quantification is more appropriate than intensity-based methods, but the widely used surface-based Closest Point Registration Error (CPRE) is known for under-estimating registration errors. In this paper, we present a surface-based method for quantification of registration errors using Matched Points Registration Error (MPRE) by computing distances between “matched-points” on segmented object surfaces in target and registered images. We compared small rigid registration errors of tube-shaped and closed surface objects quantified using MPRE with TRE and CPRE, and showed that MPRE did not show a significant difference from TRE and that CPRE was significantly lower than both MPRE and TRE.","PeriodicalId":117199,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIINFS.2009.5429837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In medical image registration, the quantification of registration errors is important in deciding the capabilities of a registration technique for a given problem, and/or for a given pair of images. The most common approach is the geometrical registration error called Target Registration Error (TRE) that measures the distance between corresponding landmarks in the target and registered images. However, finding sufficient number of corresponding landmarks is not always possible in medical images, and therefore, other measures such as, image similarity measures and surface-based error metrics have been used in quantification of registration errors. Surface-based error quantification is more appropriate than intensity-based methods, but the widely used surface-based Closest Point Registration Error (CPRE) is known for under-estimating registration errors. In this paper, we present a surface-based method for quantification of registration errors using Matched Points Registration Error (MPRE) by computing distances between “matched-points” on segmented object surfaces in target and registered images. We compared small rigid registration errors of tube-shaped and closed surface objects quantified using MPRE with TRE and CPRE, and showed that MPRE did not show a significant difference from TRE and that CPRE was significantly lower than both MPRE and TRE.
一种用于配准误差量化的基于表面的度量
在医学图像配准中,配准误差的量化是决定配准技术对给定问题和/或给定图像对的能力的重要因素。最常见的方法是称为目标配准误差(TRE)的几何配准误差,它测量目标和配准图像中相应地标之间的距离。然而,在医学图像中,找到足够数量的相应地标并不总是可能的,因此,其他度量,如图像相似性度量和基于表面的误差度量,已被用于量化配准误差。基于表面的误差量化比基于强度的方法更合适,但广泛使用的基于表面的最近点配准误差(CPRE)被认为低估了配准误差。本文提出了一种基于匹配点配准误差(MPRE)的配准误差量化方法,该方法通过计算目标和配准图像中分割物体表面上“匹配点”之间的距离来实现配准误差的量化。我们将MPRE量化的管状和封闭表面物体的小刚性配准误差与TRE和CPRE进行了比较,结果表明MPRE与TRE没有显著差异,CPRE明显低于MPRE和TRE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信