Performance comparison of multipath TCP data transferring in bottleneck and disjoint-path wired networks connected with Wi-Fi

Khemmapath Phejrsuksai, S. Pattaramalai
{"title":"Performance comparison of multipath TCP data transferring in bottleneck and disjoint-path wired networks connected with Wi-Fi","authors":"Khemmapath Phejrsuksai, S. Pattaramalai","doi":"10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a performance comparison of multipath TCP (MPTCP) data transmission with different packet sizes in two wired network models, Bottleneck (BN) and Disjoint-Path (DP), connected with two Wi-Fi base stations. Using network simulator version 2 (NS-2), the effects of the wired network link parameters, wireless channel, and Wi-Fi end receiver conditions to MPTCP transferring are simulated. Then throughput at wireless receiver is used for both network models performance comparing. Simulation results show that DP network has higher throughputs than BN network when large packet size is used but the maximum throughputs are limited by links connected to Wi-Fi base stations. In addition, throughputs are decreased faster in DP model than BN model when delay time increases in wired links. Also, throughputs are decreased faster in DP than BN when wireless channel is worse and when receiver is further or moving away faster from base stations. Finally, DP and BN models has the same low throughput when there is very high delay time in wired network or when the wireless receiver is far or move away faster from base stations.","PeriodicalId":196081,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents a performance comparison of multipath TCP (MPTCP) data transmission with different packet sizes in two wired network models, Bottleneck (BN) and Disjoint-Path (DP), connected with two Wi-Fi base stations. Using network simulator version 2 (NS-2), the effects of the wired network link parameters, wireless channel, and Wi-Fi end receiver conditions to MPTCP transferring are simulated. Then throughput at wireless receiver is used for both network models performance comparing. Simulation results show that DP network has higher throughputs than BN network when large packet size is used but the maximum throughputs are limited by links connected to Wi-Fi base stations. In addition, throughputs are decreased faster in DP model than BN model when delay time increases in wired links. Also, throughputs are decreased faster in DP than BN when wireless channel is worse and when receiver is further or moving away faster from base stations. Finally, DP and BN models has the same low throughput when there is very high delay time in wired network or when the wireless receiver is far or move away faster from base stations.
Wi-Fi连接的瓶颈和非连接路径有线网络中多路径TCP数据传输性能比较
本文在两个Wi-Fi基站连接的两种有线网络模型(瓶颈网络(瓶颈)和分离路径网络(分离路径))中,对不同数据包大小的多路径TCP (MPTCP)数据传输性能进行了比较。利用网络模拟器版本2 (NS-2),模拟了有线网络链路参数、无线信道和Wi-Fi端接收条件对MPTCP传输的影响。然后利用无线接收机的吞吐量对两种网络模型进行性能比较。仿真结果表明,DP网络在使用大数据包大小时比BN网络具有更高的吞吐量,但最大吞吐量受到Wi-Fi基站连接链路的限制。此外,随着有线链路延迟时间的增加,DP模型的吞吐量下降速度比BN模型快。此外,当无线信道较差以及接收器离基站较远或移动较快时,DP的吞吐量比BN下降得更快。最后,当有线网络中延迟时间非常高或无线接收器离基站较远或移动速度较快时,DP和BN模型具有相同的低吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信