Evaluation of Hybridization of GA and TS Algorithms for Independent Batch Scheduling in Computational Grids

F. Xhafa, J. Kolodziej, L. Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, Rozeta Miho, M. Takizawa
{"title":"Evaluation of Hybridization of GA and TS Algorithms for Independent Batch Scheduling in Computational Grids","authors":"F. Xhafa, J. Kolodziej, L. Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, Rozeta Miho, M. Takizawa","doi":"10.1109/3PGCIC.2011.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computing efficiently a planning of incoming jobs to available machines in the Grid system is a main requirement for optimized system performance. One version of the problem is that of independent batch scheduling in which jobs are assumed independent and are scheduled in batches aiming to minimize the make span and flow time. Given the hardness of the problem, heuristics are used to find high quality solutions for practical purposes of designing efficient Grid schedulers. In this paper we present a study on the performance of two algorithms for the problem: Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and Tabu Search (TS), and two hybridizations of them, namely, the GA(TS) and GA-TS which differ in the way the main control and cooperation among GA and TS are implemented. The hierarchic and simultaneous optimization modes are considered for the bi-objective scheduling problem. The evaluation is done using different grid scenarios generated by a grid simulator. The computational results showed that the hybrid algorithms outperforms both the GA and TS for make span parameter but not for the flow time parameter.","PeriodicalId":251730,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2011.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Computing efficiently a planning of incoming jobs to available machines in the Grid system is a main requirement for optimized system performance. One version of the problem is that of independent batch scheduling in which jobs are assumed independent and are scheduled in batches aiming to minimize the make span and flow time. Given the hardness of the problem, heuristics are used to find high quality solutions for practical purposes of designing efficient Grid schedulers. In this paper we present a study on the performance of two algorithms for the problem: Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and Tabu Search (TS), and two hybridizations of them, namely, the GA(TS) and GA-TS which differ in the way the main control and cooperation among GA and TS are implemented. The hierarchic and simultaneous optimization modes are considered for the bi-objective scheduling problem. The evaluation is done using different grid scenarios generated by a grid simulator. The computational results showed that the hybrid algorithms outperforms both the GA and TS for make span parameter but not for the flow time parameter.
计算网格中独立批调度的GA和TS算法的杂交评价
高效地计算网格系统中可用机器的传入作业计划是优化系统性能的主要要求。该问题的一个版本是独立批调度,其中假定作业是独立的,并分批调度,目的是最小化制造跨度和流程时间。考虑到问题的难度,启发式被用于寻找高质量的解决方案,以设计高效的网格调度程序。本文研究了遗传算法(GAs)和禁忌搜索(TS)这两种算法的性能,以及它们的两种杂交算法,即GA(TS)和GA-TS,它们在实现GA和TS的主控制和合作方式上有所不同。考虑了双目标调度问题的分层优化和同步优化模式。评估是使用网格模拟器生成的不同网格场景来完成的。计算结果表明,混合算法在跨度参数上优于遗传算法和TS算法,但在流时间参数上优于TS算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信