Reducing web latency: the virtue of gentle aggression

Tobias Flach, Nandita Dukkipati, A. Terzis, B. Raghavan, N. Cardwell, Yuchung Cheng, Ankur Jain, Shuai Hao, Ethan Katz-Bassett, R. Govindan
{"title":"Reducing web latency: the virtue of gentle aggression","authors":"Tobias Flach, Nandita Dukkipati, A. Terzis, B. Raghavan, N. Cardwell, Yuchung Cheng, Ankur Jain, Shuai Hao, Ethan Katz-Bassett, R. Govindan","doi":"10.1145/2486001.2486014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To serve users quickly, Web service providers build infrastructure closer to clients and use multi-stage transport connections. Although these changes reduce client-perceived round-trip times, TCP's current mechanisms fundamentally limit latency improvements. We performed a measurement study of a large Web service provider and found that, while connections with no loss complete close to the ideal latency of one round-trip time, TCP's timeout-driven recovery causes transfers with loss to take five times longer on average. In this paper, we present the design of novel loss recovery mechanisms for TCP that judiciously use redundant transmissions to minimize timeout-driven recovery. Proactive, Reactive, and Corrective are three qualitatively-different, easily-deployable mechanisms that (1) proactively recover from losses, (2) recover from them as quickly as possible, and (3) reconstruct packets to mask loss. Crucially, the mechanisms are compatible both with middleboxes and with TCP's existing congestion control and loss recovery. Our large-scale experiments on Google's production network that serves billions of flows demonstrate a 23% decrease in the mean and 47% in 99th percentile latency over today's TCP.","PeriodicalId":159374,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"227","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2486001.2486014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 227

Abstract

To serve users quickly, Web service providers build infrastructure closer to clients and use multi-stage transport connections. Although these changes reduce client-perceived round-trip times, TCP's current mechanisms fundamentally limit latency improvements. We performed a measurement study of a large Web service provider and found that, while connections with no loss complete close to the ideal latency of one round-trip time, TCP's timeout-driven recovery causes transfers with loss to take five times longer on average. In this paper, we present the design of novel loss recovery mechanisms for TCP that judiciously use redundant transmissions to minimize timeout-driven recovery. Proactive, Reactive, and Corrective are three qualitatively-different, easily-deployable mechanisms that (1) proactively recover from losses, (2) recover from them as quickly as possible, and (3) reconstruct packets to mask loss. Crucially, the mechanisms are compatible both with middleboxes and with TCP's existing congestion control and loss recovery. Our large-scale experiments on Google's production network that serves billions of flows demonstrate a 23% decrease in the mean and 47% in 99th percentile latency over today's TCP.
减少网络延迟:温和攻击的优点
为了快速地为用户提供服务,Web服务提供者构建离客户端更近的基础设施,并使用多级传输连接。尽管这些更改减少了客户端感知到的往返时间,但TCP当前的机制从根本上限制了延迟的改进。我们对一家大型Web服务提供商进行了测量研究,发现虽然没有丢失的连接完全接近理想的一次往返延迟时间,但TCP超时驱动的恢复导致丢失传输的平均时间延长了五倍。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的TCP损失恢复机制的设计,该机制明智地使用冗余传输来最小化超时驱动的恢复。主动、被动和纠正是三种性质不同、易于部署的机制,它们可以(1)主动地从丢失中恢复,(2)尽可能快地从丢失中恢复,(3)重构数据包以掩盖丢失。至关重要的是,这些机制既与中间层兼容,也与TCP现有的拥塞控制和损失恢复兼容。我们在谷歌的生产网络上进行的大规模实验显示,与今天的TCP相比,平均延迟减少了23%,第99百分位延迟减少了47%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信