{"title":"Landscape, Still Life, and Portrait as Titles of Poems","authors":"Victoria Malkina","doi":"10.31168/2412-6446.2019.14.1-2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is devoted to the problem of visual aspect in literature. We study one of the aspects of the visual in a lyrical poem: the representation of painting genres in the titles of the poems, as well as the interaction between the visual and the verbal in lyrical texts. The goal of the paper is to analyze the semantics of such a title and its influence on both the unfolding of the lyrical plot and the figurative system of the poem, also on the strategy of the perception of such text by a reader. To do this, we solve several problems. First of all, we define the concept of the visual in literature; the concepts of the visuality and the visualization are delimited. Secondly, we consider the main ways of representing of the visual in a lyrical text (taking into account the specifics of the lyric as a kind of literature): lyrical plot, image, compositional forms (a description, a dream, an ekphrasis), and allusions to the genres of painting. Thirdly, the importance of analyzing the title for a lyrical poem is justified. Finally, the most representative texts are analyzed from the specified point of view: we examine how the allusion to the painting is manifested in the title.The material of the paper is the number of poems by the Russian and the Polish poets of the nineteenth – twentieth centuries. Their titles coincide with the main genres of paintings, for example, “Landscape”, “Portrait” and “Still Life (nature morte)”. But at the same time, they are not considered to be ekphrasises. That means there is no any description of a real or imaginary picture there, but there is a recreation of the visual imaginative system by the verbal means; and the poems appeal to the reader's viewing experience. In particular, we analyze the poems of A. Maikov, I. Selvinsky, Y. Levitansky, B. Akhmadulina, L. Martynov, J. Przyboś, A. Pushkin, V. Khodasevich, D. Kedrin, Y. Hartwig, I. Brodsky, A. Svershchinskoy.","PeriodicalId":412661,"journal":{"name":"Slavic World in the Third Millennium","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavic World in the Third Millennium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2412-6446.2019.14.1-2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the problem of visual aspect in literature. We study one of the aspects of the visual in a lyrical poem: the representation of painting genres in the titles of the poems, as well as the interaction between the visual and the verbal in lyrical texts. The goal of the paper is to analyze the semantics of such a title and its influence on both the unfolding of the lyrical plot and the figurative system of the poem, also on the strategy of the perception of such text by a reader. To do this, we solve several problems. First of all, we define the concept of the visual in literature; the concepts of the visuality and the visualization are delimited. Secondly, we consider the main ways of representing of the visual in a lyrical text (taking into account the specifics of the lyric as a kind of literature): lyrical plot, image, compositional forms (a description, a dream, an ekphrasis), and allusions to the genres of painting. Thirdly, the importance of analyzing the title for a lyrical poem is justified. Finally, the most representative texts are analyzed from the specified point of view: we examine how the allusion to the painting is manifested in the title.The material of the paper is the number of poems by the Russian and the Polish poets of the nineteenth – twentieth centuries. Their titles coincide with the main genres of paintings, for example, “Landscape”, “Portrait” and “Still Life (nature morte)”. But at the same time, they are not considered to be ekphrasises. That means there is no any description of a real or imaginary picture there, but there is a recreation of the visual imaginative system by the verbal means; and the poems appeal to the reader's viewing experience. In particular, we analyze the poems of A. Maikov, I. Selvinsky, Y. Levitansky, B. Akhmadulina, L. Martynov, J. Przyboś, A. Pushkin, V. Khodasevich, D. Kedrin, Y. Hartwig, I. Brodsky, A. Svershchinskoy.
本文主要探讨文学作品的视觉方面问题。我们研究了抒情诗中视觉的一个方面:诗歌标题中绘画流派的表现,以及抒情诗文本中视觉与言语的互动。本文的目的是分析这一标题的语义及其对诗歌的抒情情节展开和比喻系统的影响,以及读者对这一文本的感知策略。要做到这一点,我们需要解决几个问题。首先,我们对文学中的视觉概念进行了界定;对可视化和可视化的概念进行了界定。其次,我们考虑了抒情文本中视觉表现的主要方式(考虑到抒情作为一种文学的特殊性):抒情情节、意象、构图形式(描述、梦境、短语)和对绘画流派的典故。第三,分析抒情诗标题的重要性是有道理的。最后,从特定的角度对最具代表性的文本进行分析:考察对画作的典故如何在标题中表现出来。论文的材料是19 - 20世纪俄罗斯和波兰诗人的诗歌数量。他们的标题与绘画的主要流派相吻合,例如,“风景”,“肖像”和“静物(自然)”。但与此同时,它们不被认为是短语。这意味着这里没有任何对真实或想象画面的描述,而是通过语言手段对视觉想象系统的再创造;这些诗吸引了读者的观看体验。我们特别分析了A. Maikov, I. Selvinsky, Y. Levitansky, B. Akhmadulina, L. Martynov, J. przybova, A. 普希金,V. Khodasevich, D. Kedrin, Y. Hartwig, I. Brodsky, A. svershchinsky的诗歌。