Economic Consequences of Divorce in the United States: Recent Developments

J. Oldham
{"title":"Economic Consequences of Divorce in the United States: Recent Developments","authors":"J. Oldham","doi":"10.1163/9789004304925_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most states, divorce courts distinguish between the divisible marital estate, generally acquisitions during marriage due to efforts, and pre-marriage acquisitions and gifts or inheritances received during marriage, which are not divisible. The divisible marital estate is divided “equitably,” which usually means that the spouse with the lower earning capacity gets more than half of the marital estate. In many states, these rules can be changed substantially if the parties sign a premarital agreement.If there are minor children, child support is set pursuant to a formula or chart. Courts rarely deviate from this presumptive child support amount, unless the parties have joint physical custody.Spousal support is the wild card. A few states have established more definite rules regarding spousal support. But in most states, courts have great discretion both regarding when spousal support is warranted, as well as regarding the amount and duration of any such award. It is not clear why this has occurred. Apparently the subject is so controversial that legislators cannot agree on a clearer rule and therefore defer to a judge’s discretion.But this situation must make it very difficult for family lawyers to counsel clients about potential outcomes in divorce cases, and thereby impedes settlement discussions and leads to arbitrary results. Perhaps U.S. states can learn from the Canadian experience. When they confronted unclear rules for spousal support, they appointed a committee of lawyers, judges and law professors to formulate advisory standards for spousal support. Perhaps such groups, if established in a state, could clarify what is actually happening in state divorce courts and could thereby give lawyers and their clients some additional guidance about probable divorce outcomes.","PeriodicalId":115265,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Compensation Law (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Compensation Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304925_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most states, divorce courts distinguish between the divisible marital estate, generally acquisitions during marriage due to efforts, and pre-marriage acquisitions and gifts or inheritances received during marriage, which are not divisible. The divisible marital estate is divided “equitably,” which usually means that the spouse with the lower earning capacity gets more than half of the marital estate. In many states, these rules can be changed substantially if the parties sign a premarital agreement.If there are minor children, child support is set pursuant to a formula or chart. Courts rarely deviate from this presumptive child support amount, unless the parties have joint physical custody.Spousal support is the wild card. A few states have established more definite rules regarding spousal support. But in most states, courts have great discretion both regarding when spousal support is warranted, as well as regarding the amount and duration of any such award. It is not clear why this has occurred. Apparently the subject is so controversial that legislators cannot agree on a clearer rule and therefore defer to a judge’s discretion.But this situation must make it very difficult for family lawyers to counsel clients about potential outcomes in divorce cases, and thereby impedes settlement discussions and leads to arbitrary results. Perhaps U.S. states can learn from the Canadian experience. When they confronted unclear rules for spousal support, they appointed a committee of lawyers, judges and law professors to formulate advisory standards for spousal support. Perhaps such groups, if established in a state, could clarify what is actually happening in state divorce courts and could thereby give lawyers and their clients some additional guidance about probable divorce outcomes.
美国离婚的经济后果:最近的发展
在大多数州,离婚法院区分可分割的婚姻财产(通常是在婚姻期间因努力而获得的财产)和婚前获得的财产、婚姻期间收到的礼物或遗产(不可分割)。可分割的婚姻遗产是“公平”分配的,这通常意味着收入能力较低的一方获得一半以上的婚姻遗产。在许多州,如果双方签署婚前协议,这些规则可以有实质性的改变。如果有未成年子女,子女抚养费将根据公式或图表确定。法院很少偏离这一推定的子女抚养费数额,除非双方有共同监护权。配偶抚养费是个未知数。一些州对配偶赡养费制定了更明确的规定。但在大多数州,法院对配偶赡养费的保证时间以及任何此类裁决的金额和期限都有很大的自由裁量权。目前尚不清楚发生这种情况的原因。显然,这个问题争议很大,以至于立法者无法就更明确的规则达成一致,因此要听从法官的自由裁量权。但这种情况必然使家庭律师很难就离婚案件的潜在结果向客户提供咨询,从而阻碍了和解讨论,并导致武断的结果。也许美国各州可以借鉴加拿大的经验。面对不明确的赡养费规定,他们任命了由律师、法官、法学教授组成的委员会,制定赡养费咨询标准。也许这样的团体,如果在一个州成立,可以澄清在州离婚法庭实际发生的事情,从而可以给律师和他们的客户一些关于可能的离婚结果的额外指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信