On CASE tool usage at Nokia

A. Maccari, C. Riva, Francesco Maccari
{"title":"On CASE tool usage at Nokia","authors":"A. Maccari, C. Riva, Francesco Maccari","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2002.1114995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the results of a research work targeted to understanding CASE tools usage in Nokia. By means of a survey questionnaire, we collected data aimed to identify what features are most useful and best implemented in current CASE tools according to senior developers and managers. With the aid of both descriptive and inferential statistical data analysis methods, we found out that the features that are rated most useful belong to the graphical editing, version management and document generation categories. The statistical methods we use allow us to extend the results to the whole population with a certain degree of confidence. The analysis of the data seems to give the indication that there is a general level of dissatisfaction on the quality of currently available CASE tools. Also, there is evidence that some of the most advanced features (reverse engineering, code generation) are not deemed as useful as others. Further research should focus on extending the survey to other types of industries, and attempt generalization of the results. This may constitute precious feedback for the software tools industry in order to develop products that correspond more to industry needs.","PeriodicalId":163532,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering,","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering,","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2002.1114995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We present the results of a research work targeted to understanding CASE tools usage in Nokia. By means of a survey questionnaire, we collected data aimed to identify what features are most useful and best implemented in current CASE tools according to senior developers and managers. With the aid of both descriptive and inferential statistical data analysis methods, we found out that the features that are rated most useful belong to the graphical editing, version management and document generation categories. The statistical methods we use allow us to extend the results to the whole population with a certain degree of confidence. The analysis of the data seems to give the indication that there is a general level of dissatisfaction on the quality of currently available CASE tools. Also, there is evidence that some of the most advanced features (reverse engineering, code generation) are not deemed as useful as others. Further research should focus on extending the survey to other types of industries, and attempt generalization of the results. This may constitute precious feedback for the software tools industry in order to develop products that correspond more to industry needs.
关于CASE工具在诺基亚的使用
我们提出了一项研究工作的结果,旨在了解案例工具在诺基亚的使用情况。通过调查问卷的方式,我们收集了数据,目的是根据高级开发人员和管理人员确定当前CASE工具中最有用的和最好实现的特性。借助描述性和推理性统计数据分析方法,我们发现最有用的功能属于图形编辑、版本管理和文档生成类别。我们使用的统计方法使我们能够以一定程度的信心将结果扩展到整个人口。对数据的分析似乎表明,人们对当前可用的CASE工具的质量普遍不满意。此外,有证据表明,一些最先进的特性(逆向工程、代码生成)并不像其他特性那样有用。进一步的研究应侧重于将调查扩展到其他类型的行业,并尝试推广结果。为了开发更符合行业需求的产品,这可能会为软件工具行业提供宝贵的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信