A Node Performance and Encountering Probability-Based Adaptive Routing for Delay Tolerant Networks

Fang Lu, Jianbo Li
{"title":"A Node Performance and Encountering Probability-Based Adaptive Routing for Delay Tolerant Networks","authors":"Fang Lu, Jianbo Li","doi":"10.1109/MSN.2016.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delay Tolerant Networks (DTNs) are characterized by node mobility and partitioned network topology, extremely long delivery latency, etc. Consequently, the traditional ad-hoc routing algorithms cannot work well in DTNs. In order to provide effective communication services in DTNs, in this paper, we propose an adaptive routing based on Node Performance and Encountering Probability (NPEP). NPEP chronologically consists of two phases, the asymmetric distribution stage and the probability forwarding stage. In the asymmetric distribution stage, by considering node throughput, we define an absorbing metric to select a better node as the next relay node. We also define another node activeness metric to asymmetrically allocate copies to relay nodes. In the probability forwarding stage, we evaluate the encountering probability with the destination node in order to select a better next relay node to optimize delivery ratio. Extensive simulations have been conducted and the results show that NPEP outperforms Epidemic, FirstContact and NPSW in terms of delivery rate, average latency and average hop count in the Random Waypoint mobility model. Specifically, NPEP has less average hop count than other three algorithms, and the overhead ratio of NPEP is 45% and 43% less than that of Epidemic, FirstContact.","PeriodicalId":135328,"journal":{"name":"2016 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN)","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSN.2016.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Delay Tolerant Networks (DTNs) are characterized by node mobility and partitioned network topology, extremely long delivery latency, etc. Consequently, the traditional ad-hoc routing algorithms cannot work well in DTNs. In order to provide effective communication services in DTNs, in this paper, we propose an adaptive routing based on Node Performance and Encountering Probability (NPEP). NPEP chronologically consists of two phases, the asymmetric distribution stage and the probability forwarding stage. In the asymmetric distribution stage, by considering node throughput, we define an absorbing metric to select a better node as the next relay node. We also define another node activeness metric to asymmetrically allocate copies to relay nodes. In the probability forwarding stage, we evaluate the encountering probability with the destination node in order to select a better next relay node to optimize delivery ratio. Extensive simulations have been conducted and the results show that NPEP outperforms Epidemic, FirstContact and NPSW in terms of delivery rate, average latency and average hop count in the Random Waypoint mobility model. Specifically, NPEP has less average hop count than other three algorithms, and the overhead ratio of NPEP is 45% and 43% less than that of Epidemic, FirstContact.
时延容忍网络中基于节点性能和相遇概率的自适应路由
容忍延迟网络(Delay tolerance network, DTNs)具有节点可移动性和分区网络拓扑结构、极长的传输延迟等特点。因此,传统的自组织路由算法不能很好地在ddn中工作。为了在DTNs中提供有效的通信服务,本文提出了一种基于节点性能和相遇概率(NPEP)的自适应路由。NPEP在时间上分为两个阶段:不对称分布阶段和概率转发阶段。在非对称分布阶段,通过考虑节点吞吐量,定义一个吸收度量来选择一个更好的节点作为下一个中继节点。我们还定义了另一个节点活跃度度量来不对称地将副本分配给中继节点。在概率转发阶段,我们评估与目标节点的相遇概率,以便选择更好的下一个中继节点来优化投递率。大量的仿真结果表明,在随机路点移动模型中,NPEP在投递率、平均延迟和平均跳数方面优于Epidemic、FirstContact和NPSW。具体来说,NPEP的平均跳数比其他三种算法少,开销比Epidemic、FirstContact分别小45%和43%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信