Cross Hedging Effectiveness of S&P500 and NIKKEI225 Futures to the Philippine Stock Exchange Composite Index

P. Maghirang
{"title":"Cross Hedging Effectiveness of S&P500 and NIKKEI225 Futures to the Philippine Stock Exchange Composite Index","authors":"P. Maghirang","doi":"10.16980/JITC.12.4.201608.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study evaluated other countries’ index futures in managing risk of PSEi by using 486 daily closing prices from, May 15, 2013 to October 8, 2015. Cross-hedging ratios and cross-hedging performance of S&P500 and NIKKEI225 futures were estimated with the use of the OLS regression, VECM and the GARCH models. The cross-hedging effectiveness analysis was performed by in-sample and out-of-sample excluding data of 86 days. The results from unit root test showed that the time series of the first difference variables were stationary. The long-run relationship between PSEi and the three index futures was established by applying the Johansen co-integration model. The computed hedge ratios and cross-hedging effectiveness were almost similar for OLS and GARCH method. Among the two index futures, S&P500 futures has better cross-hedging effectiveness with PSEi than NIKKEI225 futures. But overall, the two futures used was not as effective in minimizing risk of PSEi as compared to direct hedging. Hence, it is necessary to look for other possible risk management tool (i.e. other countries’ index futures/foreign exchange futures) to be cross-hedged with PSEi that will produce a better hedging effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":306457,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Futures (Topic)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Futures (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/JITC.12.4.201608.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluated other countries’ index futures in managing risk of PSEi by using 486 daily closing prices from, May 15, 2013 to October 8, 2015. Cross-hedging ratios and cross-hedging performance of S&P500 and NIKKEI225 futures were estimated with the use of the OLS regression, VECM and the GARCH models. The cross-hedging effectiveness analysis was performed by in-sample and out-of-sample excluding data of 86 days. The results from unit root test showed that the time series of the first difference variables were stationary. The long-run relationship between PSEi and the three index futures was established by applying the Johansen co-integration model. The computed hedge ratios and cross-hedging effectiveness were almost similar for OLS and GARCH method. Among the two index futures, S&P500 futures has better cross-hedging effectiveness with PSEi than NIKKEI225 futures. But overall, the two futures used was not as effective in minimizing risk of PSEi as compared to direct hedging. Hence, it is necessary to look for other possible risk management tool (i.e. other countries’ index futures/foreign exchange futures) to be cross-hedged with PSEi that will produce a better hedging effectiveness.
标准普尔500和日经225期货对菲律宾证券交易所综合指数的交叉对冲有效性
本研究使用2013年5月15日至2015年10月8日的486个每日收盘价来评估其他国家指数期货管理PSEi风险的能力。运用OLS回归、VECM和GARCH模型对标准普尔500指数和日经225指数期货的交叉套期保值比率和交叉套期保值业绩进行了估计。交叉对冲有效性分析采用样本内和样本外排除86天的数据。单位根检验结果表明,一阶差分变量的时间序列是平稳的。运用Johansen协整模型建立了PSEi与三大股指期货的长期关系。OLS和GARCH方法计算的套期保值比率和交叉套期保值有效性几乎相似。在两种指数期货中,标普500期货与PSEi的交叉对冲效果优于日经225期货。但总体而言,与直接对冲相比,所使用的两种期货在最小化PSEi风险方面并不有效。因此,有必要寻找其他可能的风险管理工具(即其他国家的指数期货/外汇期货)与PSEi交叉对冲,从而产生更好的对冲效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信