Candidate Gender

D. Doherty, C. Dowling, Michael G. Miller
{"title":"Candidate Gender","authors":"D. Doherty, C. Dowling, Michael G. Miller","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197605004.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women continue to be under-represented in elected office in the United States. Chapter 8 assesses whether chairs view women candidates as less viable, as well as whether voters are less inclined to support women candidates. The experimental findings offer little support for the notion that chairs systematically view women candidates as less likely to win, a pattern that is consistent with the (lack of) gender effects that emerge among voters. This said, although some of the chairs interviewed in person said they view gender as irrelevant, most viewed women candidates as tending to have distinctive advantages and, in some cases, disadvantages. The most common theme that arose in the interviews was the perception—consistent with evidence from existing work—that women candidates tend to be more qualified and harder working, entering a race only when they are well-prepared and conditions are ripe.","PeriodicalId":314673,"journal":{"name":"Small Power","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197605004.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women continue to be under-represented in elected office in the United States. Chapter 8 assesses whether chairs view women candidates as less viable, as well as whether voters are less inclined to support women candidates. The experimental findings offer little support for the notion that chairs systematically view women candidates as less likely to win, a pattern that is consistent with the (lack of) gender effects that emerge among voters. This said, although some of the chairs interviewed in person said they view gender as irrelevant, most viewed women candidates as tending to have distinctive advantages and, in some cases, disadvantages. The most common theme that arose in the interviews was the perception—consistent with evidence from existing work—that women candidates tend to be more qualified and harder working, entering a race only when they are well-prepared and conditions are ripe.
候选人的性别
在美国,妇女在民选公职中的代表人数仍然不足。第8章评估主席是否认为女性候选人不太可行,以及选民是否不太倾向于支持女性候选人。实验结果几乎没有支持主席系统性地认为女性候选人不太可能获胜的观点,这种模式与选民中出现的性别效应(缺乏)是一致的。也就是说,尽管一些接受采访的主席表示,他们认为性别无关紧要,但大多数人认为女性候选人往往有明显的优势,在某些情况下也有劣势。面试中最常见的主题是一种看法——与现有工作的证据一致——即女性候选人往往更有资格、更努力,只有在准备充分、条件成熟的情况下才会参加竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信